|

Statement by Minister Shatter on the morning after “Mission to Prey”

“I share the widespread public concern and disgust at the revelations which the programme contained. While the behaviour took place abroad, we have a solemn duty to do all that is  within our power to ensure that perpetrators of this predatory abuse of  children are bought to justice where ever it takes place. There can be no
hiding place for those who do these despicable acts to children.

I have been in touch with the Garda Commissioner about this matter who, of course, shares my concern at the revelations in the programme ….Investigations and bringing prosecutions in relation to offences carried out abroad are, of their nature, very difficult and I do not  want to raise any unrealistic expectations about what can be achieved. But I  believe that people are entitled to be reassured that we are doing everything  open to us to counteract this evil where ever it takes place.”

(Underlining ours)

Similar Posts

  • Accentuate the Positive

    Articles
    4 Comments

    Seamus Ahearne takes a look at current happenings and decides that we should ‘Accentuate the Positive’.
    “never mind what has happened or is happening or how church people are characterised – we still are missioned and graced by God. We need to believe in ourselves. We need to get on with life. We may age. We may not have replacements. But faith goes on. God goes on. The sun still rises. The daffodils still fight their way out of the ground and are heard and seen despite the bad weather. Why can’t we do the same? Get on with it. “
    Seamus also confirms that he won’t be the next Archbishop of Dublin! 

  • Lima’s call for Climate Action

    Articles, Creation / Ecology
    8 Comments

    Sean McDonagh gives his reaction to the report from COP20 in Lima.
    The Lima document broke with all previous COPs where the burden of reducing greenhouse gases was placed squarely on the shoulders of rich countries which historically have been emitting carbon dioxide since the beginning of the industrial revolution. In Lima poor countries felt that rich countries were attempting to move the burden of reducing carbon dioxide emissions on to their shoulders.

  • Stifle debate, stifle church

    Articles, Reform of the Irish Church
    7 Comments

    Tony Flannery has written an article, published in The Irish Times and on his own website, about the attempted stifling of the debate about the ordination of women.

    “The efforts made by the Vatican to silence discussion on the ordination of women over the past 50 years have been both unsuccessful and unwise.”
    “Though Pope Francis has said that this door is closed, his consistent call for open discussion and dialogue, and indeed for open doors, has created a climate where the whole issue of women’s place in the church is now centre stage.”
    “The effort by the Vatican to stifle debate, often by using methods that should never be part of the Christian community, is doing enormous damage to the church.”

  • Church faces ‘huge wake up call’

    Articles, Editor's Choice, Reform of the Irish Church
    10 Comments

    Noel Baker reports in the Irish Examiner on the The Irish Examiner / ICMSA Farming Poll that brought to light the latest views and opinions on religion and the priesthood among the farming community.
    Taken among what is regarded as a very traditional group (69% of the respondents said they attended Mass every week), 82% of respondents agreed that priests should be allowed to marry.
    Regarding the ordination of women 70% of those aged 34 and under supported such a move, but a higher percentage of older farmers backed the idea of women priests, from 75% of those aged over 65, to 87% of those aged 55 to 64. While 82% of men supported the idea of women priests, 76% of women were in favour.

    Sean McDonagh commented “The most interesting thing is here are lay people and people of faith seeing that the present rules are not functioning and want to see a change to allow it to function better,”

    The survey certainly shows a hierarchy with views at total odds with the laity.

    Archbishop Brown, Papal Nuncio, said “allowing serving priests to marry or allowing women priests would not be following the Catholic tradition.”

4 Comments

  1. Eddie Finnegan says:

    And there was I thinking that the investigation of RTÉ should be in the hands of the MINISTER OF JUSTICE rather than left to Pat Rabbitte. Silly me! Still, a man who can hint at unlocking the Seal of Confession might have ways of getting Aoife Kavanagh to reveal her reliable source ?

    Reply

  2. Has anybody actually confronted Mr Shatter directly about this matter? Or brought it to the Taoiseach’s attention. If so, I would strongly expect some kind of public apology from Mr Shatter, regretting that he seemed to endorse that wrongful allegation against Fr Reynolds as though it were an established fact. Surely Mr Kenny, who was so outspoken against what he deemed unacceptable Vatican procedures, cannot condone such a failure to apologise from one of his own appointees?

    Reply
  3. Pádraig McCarthy says:

    In October, I pointed this out in a letter in the Irish Times.
    I sent an email last week to the Minister. This morning I received this reply:

    “Thank you for your email of 19 November, 2011 about a statement made by the Minister for Justice and Equality in the light of a Prime Time investigates programme.

    It is not accepted that the Minister’s statement in the light of the Prime Time programme in question could reasonably be open to the interpretation that the Minister was commenting in any way on the accuracy or otherwise of specific claims made in the programme. The statement the Minister made was based on an assumption that the matters detailed on the programme had been fully researched and corroborated in accordance with proper journalistic and ethical standards. It is now known of course that with regard to Fr. Reynolds not only did he deny the allegations made but he also offered through his solicitor to engage in DNA testing and, despite said offer being made, the programme was broadcast. The Minister, together with his cabinet colleagues views this with the utmost seriousness and fully supports the inquiry that Minister Rabbitte proposed as agreed by Cabinet this week.

    Alan Shatter TD’s Constituency Office
    Minister for Justice and Equality”

    I replied as follows:

    “Thank you for your reply.
    You write: “The statement the Minister made was based on an assumption that the matters detailed on the programme had been fully researched …”
    This is precisely the point: it is an assumption which the Minister should never have made. I pointed this out in a letter in the Irish Times following the first RTÉ apology on 7 & 8 October.
    It would not be acceptable in a court of law. He must know better. It is all the more disturbing both that he is a lawyer of many years experience, and that he is Minister for Justice.
    If a bishop were to make such an assumption in a statement, he would be rightly castigated.

    You write: “It is not accepted that the Minister’s statement in the light of the Prime Time programme in question could reasonably be open to the interpretation …”
    It may not be accepted in his constituency office, but it is certainly the perception among many people outside that office.

    For these reasons, he must urgently consider issuing a clarification and an apology. A note should also be appended to his statement on http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PR11000064.
    If he fails to do this, his position in government must be in question.
    I do not wish the Minister any ill; my father had a saying many years ago: “it could happen to a bishop”. The Minister is not infallible. I simply want to see him act with justice.”

    And to this I received the following reply:

    “Please be assured that the Minister takes this matter very seriously. The Minister considered the matter with the Taoiseach and his colleagues in Government at Tuesday’s Cabinet meeting. That meeting decided that there should be an independent inquiry to determine the true facts and circumstances which led to the Prime Time programme on Fr Reynolds being broadcast on RTÉ in May of this year.

    More details about the inquiry can be found on the following link:

    http://www.merrionstreet.ie/index.php/2011/11/minister-rabbitte-on-the-case-of-father-kevin-reynolds/

    The Minister looks forward to this report.

    Your comments and suggestions will be brought to the Minister’s attention.”

    The Minister is kicking for touch.

    Pádraig McCarthy

    Reply

  4. well said Padraig

    Shatter is a lawyer. He knew exactly what he was saying. Media and political collusion.

    Partly down to a witch hunt mentality. Mainly down to an assumption, in the media/political class, that they can say what they want about Catholics and not expect a reply or challenge.. until now

    Look at how shocked and dumbstruck Kenny et al were when the Vatican had the audacity to challenge his speech on factual grounds..

    Reply

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.