Vatican News – Pope Leo’s Dilexi Te: Faith cannot be separated from love for the poor
Taking up Francis’ desire “that all Christians come to appreciate the close connection between Christ’s love and his summons to care for the poor”, Pope Leo XIV issues his first Apostolic Exhortation, “Dilexi te”, as a call to Christ’s disciples “to recognize him in the poor and the suffering”.
By Salvatore Cernuzio
Pope Leo XIV’s first Apostolic Exhortation sees the love of Christ incarnated in love for the poor, in caring for the sick, opposing slavery, defending women who experience exclusion and violence, making education available to all, accompanying migrants, charitable giving, working for equality and more.
Dilexi te (“I have loved you”, from Rev 3:9) unfolds in 121 numbered paragraphs spread throughout five chapters, and flows directly from the Gospel of the Son of God, Who in the very act of entering into our world through the Incarnation became poor for our sakes. At the same time, it reproposes the Church’s social teaching, especially that of the past 150 years, as “a veritable treasury of significant teachings” concerning the poor.

Pope Leo XIV’s first Apostolic Exhortation, “Dilexi te”
Following in the footsteps of his predecessors
With this document, signed on 4 October, the feast of Saint Francis of Assis, Pope Leo situates himself firmly on the path laid out by his predecessors, including Saint John XXIII, with his appeal, in Mater et Magistra, to wealthier countries not to remain indifferent to nations oppressed by hunger and extreme poverty (83).
Saint Paul VI added his own voice with Populorum progressio and his appearance at the United Nations as an “advocate of the poor”; as did Saint John Paul II, who consolidated the doctrinal foundations of the Church’s “preferential option for the poor”.
More recently, Benedict XVI, in Caritas in veritate, offered a more markedly political take on the crises of the Third Millenium; while Francis made care for the poor and solidarity with the poor one of the key themes of his pontificate.
Begun by Francis, completed by Pope Leo
Like Francis, who completed the work of Benedict XVI on the encyclical Lumen Fidei, Pope Leo XIV took up the text of his immediate predecessor for his first major Magisterial document. Dilexi te builds on the teaching of Francis’ final encyclical – Dilexit nos, on the Sacred Heart of Jesus – highlighting the “close connection” between the love of God and love for the poor. “In the poor”, writes Pope Leo, God “continues to speak to us” (5).
The Holy Father likewise recalls the theme of the Church’s “preferential option… for the poor”, an expression that arose in the context of Latin America (16). Pope Leo explains that this “‘preference’ never indicates exclusivity or discrimination towards other groups” but instead emphasizes “God’s actions, which are moved by compassion toward the poverty and weakness of all humanity” (16).
“On the wounded faces of the poor, we see the suffering of the innocent and, therefore, the suffering of Christ Himself” (9).
The ‘faces’ of poverty
Pope Leo’s Exhortation offers numerous points for reflection and calls for action in its analysis of the many “faces of the poor and of poverty”, including “the poverty of those who lack material means of subsistence” or “who are socially marginalized and lack the means to give voice to their dignity and abilities” (9).
Pope Leo also notes the existence of moral, spiritual, and cultural poverty; the poverty of “those who have no rights, no space, no freedom” (9).
Inequality and new forms of poverty
Confronted with this reality, Pope Leo says that although “the commitment to the poor and to removing the social and structural causes of poverty has gained importance in recent decades… it remains insufficient” (10).
He warns of the emergence of new, sometimes “more subtle and dangerous” forms of poverty, and decries economic “rules” that increase wealth for a few but also increase inequality (10, 13).
“I can only state once more that inequality ‘is the root of social ills’” (94).
‘The dictatorship of an economy that kills’
“The claim that the modern world has reduced poverty is made by measuring poverty with criteria from the past that do not correspond to present-day realities”, Pope Leo writes. From this point of view, he welcomes the fact that “the United Nations has made the eradication of poverty one of its Millenium Goals” (13, 10).
However, he says, there is a long way to go, especially in an era in which the “dictatorship of an economy that kills” continues to prevail; the wealth of the few continues to grow “exponentially” while the gap between rich and poor increases; and “ideologies that defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation” remain widespread” (92).
The ‘throwaway culture’, market freedom, and pastoral care of the elites
All of this, Pope Leo says, indicates the continued existence of a “throwaway culture”, sometimes “well disguised”, that “tolerates with indifference that millions of people die of hunger or survive in conditions unfit for human beings” (96, 11).
The Holy Father condemns “pseudo-scientific data” used to support the claim “that a free-market economy will automatically solve the problem of poverty”, as well as the idea that “we should opt for pastoral work with the so-called elite, since, rather than wasting time on the poor, it would be better to care for the rich” to gain their assistance in finding real-world solutions for poverty (114).
“Indeed, ‘it frequently becomes clear that, in practice, human rights are not equal for all’” (94).
A change in mentality
Pope Leo thus calls for a “change in mentality” that can free us from “the illusion of happiness derived from a comfortable life that pushes many people towards a vision of life centred on the accumulation of wealth and social success at all costs, even at the expense of others and by taking advantage of unjust social ideals and political-economic systems that favour the strongest” (11).
“The dignity of every human person must be respected today, not tomorrow” (92).
In every rejected migrant, it is Christ Himself who knocks
Pope Leo also devotes ample space to the theme of migration, illustrating his words with the image of Alan Kurdi, the three-year-old Syrian boy who in 2015 became a symbol of the European migrant crisis with the photo of his lifeless body on a beach. “Unfortunately, apart from some momentary outcry, similar events are becoming increasingly irrelevant and seen as marginal news items”, the Pope observes (11).
At the same time, he recalls the Church’s centuries-old work in favour of those forced to abandon their lands, seen in refugee reception centres, border missions, and the efforts of Caritas Internationalis and other institutions (75).
“The Church, like a mother, accompanies those who are walking. Where the world sees threats, she sees children; where walls are built, she builds bridges. She knows that her proclamation of the Gospel is credible only when it is translated into gestures of closeness and welcome. And she knows that in every rejected migrant, it is Christ himself who knocks at the door of the community” (75).
With regard to migration, the Pope adopts Francis’ famous “four verbs”: “welcome, protect, promote, and integrate”. And he also borrows from his predecessor the description of the poor as “not only objects of our compassion, but teachers of the Gospel” (79).
“Serving the poor is not a gesture to be made ‘from above’, but an encounter between equals, where Christ is revealed and adored… Therefore, when the Church bends down to care for the poor, she assumes her highest posture” (79).
Women, victims of violence and exclusion
The Holy Father likewise considers the current situation, recalling the countless people who die every day “due to lack of food and water” (12).
Similarly, we must not forget those women, the “doubly poor… who endure situations of exclusion, mistreatment and violence, since they are frequently less able to defend their rights”, he adds, quoting Francis (12).
‘The poor are not there by chance’
Pope Leo XIV offers an in-depth reflection on the causes of poverty: “The poor are not there by chance or by blind and cruel fate. Nor, for most of them, is poverty a choice”, he says. “Yet, there are those who still presume to make this claim, thus revealing their own blindness and cruelty” (14).
While recognizing that “among the poor there are also those who do not want to work, perhaps because their ancestors, who worked all their lives, died poor”, the Pope highlights that there are “so many others — men and women — who nonetheless work from dawn to dusk, perhaps collecting scraps or the like, even though they know that their hard work will only help them to scrape by, but never really improve their lives” (14).
In one of the main points of Dilexi Te, Pope Leo insists that it cannot be said “that most of the poor are such because they do not ‘deserve’ otherwise, as maintained by that specious view of meritocracy that sees only the successful as ‘deserving’” (14).
Ideologies and political orientations
Sometimes, Pope Leo observes, Christians themselves allow themselves to succumb to attitudes shaped by “secular ideologies or political and economic approaches that lead to gross generalizations and mistaken conclusions” (15).
“There are those who say: ‘Our task is to pray and teach sound doctrine’. Separating this religious aspect from integral development, they even say that it is the government’s job to care for them, or that it would be better not to lift them out of their poverty but simply to teach them to work” (114).
Almsgiving often disparaged
A symptom of this mentality is the fact that the exercise of charity is sometimes dismissed or ridiculed “as if [it] were an obsession on the part of a few and not the burning heart of the Church’s mission” (15). The Holy Father dwells at length on almsgiving, which in our day is “rarely practiced”, and “even at times disparaged” (115).
“We Christians must not abandon almsgiving. It can be done in different ways, and surely more effectively, but it must continue to be done. It is always better at least to do something rather than nothing. Whatever form it may take, almsgiving will touch and soften our hardened hearts. It will not solve the problem of world poverty, yet it must still be carried out, with intelligence, diligence and social responsibility. For our part, we need to give alms as a way of reaching out and touching the suffering flesh of the poor” (119).
Indifference on the part of Christians
Along the same lines, the Pope acknowledges that “at times, Christian movements or groups have arisen which show little or no interest in the common good of society and, in particular, the protection and advancement of its most vulnerable and disadvantaged members” (112).
Again quoting Francis, Pope Leo warns that if “any Church community” does not cooperate “in helping the poor to live with dignity and reaching out to everyone”, it will “risk breaking down, however much it may talk about social issues or criticize governments. It will easily drift into a spiritual worldliness camouflaged by religious practices, unproductive meetings and empty talk” (113).
“We have to state, without mincing words, that there is an inseparable bond between our faith and the poor” (36).
The witness of saints, blesseds, and religious orders
In contrast to this attitude of indifference, there is a world of saints, blesseds, and missionaries who, over the centuries, have embodied the image of “a poor Church for the poor” (110), from Francis of Assisi and his gesture of embracing a leper (7), to Mother Teresa, a “universal icon of charity” dedicated to the most destitute in India, who accompanied the dying “with the tenderness of prayer” (77).
The Pope also recalls the witness of Saints including Lawrence, Justin, Ambrose, and John Chrysostom; as well as Saint Augustine, who stated: “Anyone who says they love God and has no compassion for the needy is lying”, a reference to 1 John 4:20 (45).
Pope Leo points to the work of the Camillians for the sick (50), and of the women’s congregations in hospitals and nursing homes (51). He notes the welcome given to widows, abandoned children, pilgrims, and beggars in Benedictine monasteries (55); and recalls the Franciscans, Dominicans, Carmelites, and Augustinians who initiated “an evangelical revolution” through a “simple and poor lifestyle” (63); as well as the Trinitarians and Mercedarians who, fighting for the liberation of prisoners, expressed the love of “a God who frees not only from spiritual slavery but also from concrete oppression” (60).
“The tradition of these orders did not come to an end. On the contrary, it inspired new forms of action in the face of modern forms of slavery: human trafficking, forced labour, sexual exploitation and various forms of dependency. Christian charity is liberating when it becomes incarnate” (61).
The right to education
Looking to the example of Saint Joseph Calasanz, who founded the first free public school in Europe (69), the Pope emphasizes the importance of educating the poor, which “is not a favour but a duty” (72).
“Children have a right to knowledge as a fundamental requirement for the recognition of human dignity” (72).
The efforts of popular movements
In the exhortation, the Pope also mentions the fight against the “destructive effects of the empire of money” (81) by popular movements, led by leaders often “viewed with suspicion and even persecuted” (80). Popular movements, he writes, “invite us to overcome ‘the idea of social policies being a policy for the poor, but never with the poor and never of the poor, much less part of a project which can bring people back together’” (81).
The duty of making our voices heard
In the final pages of the document, Leo XIV reminds every member of the People of God of their duty to “make their voices heard, albeit in different ways, in order to point out and denounce such structural issues, even at the cost of appearing foolish or naïve” (97).
“Unjust structures need to be recognized and eradicated by the force of good, by changing mindsets but also, with the help of science and technology, by developing effective policies for societal change” (97).
The poor at the heart of the Church
“It is evident”, Pope Leo says “that all of us must ‘let ourselves be evangelized’ by the poor” (102).
“No Christian can regard the poor simply as a societal problem”, he insists; rather “they are part of our ‘family’. They are ‘one of us’”. And so, he says, “our relationship to the poor” cannot “be reduced to merely another ecclesial activity or function” (104).
“The poor are at the heart of the Church” (111).

Examination of Conscience
The spiritual exercise known as examination of conscience may not be very much in favour just now, but it has an important place Christian history. I wonder if anyone has written the history of this practice, in which a prominent role is played by St Ignatius of Loyola. Thomas Merton has a talk on the role of the practice in monastic life.
The old Catholic Encyclopedia writes: “Francisco Suárez (Jesuit philosopher and theologian, 1548-1617) takes notice that the Fathers of the Church have not taught any set system for such examinations. The ordinary method followed in the examination for confession is to consider in succession the Ten Commandments of God, the Commandments of the Church, the Seven Capital Sins, the duties of one’s state of life, the nine ways of partaking in the sin of others.”
“A Detailed Catholic Examination of Conscience” at a website called Bulldog Catholic rather well illustrates the features which have caused examination of conscience to fall into disfavour. Organized according to the framework of the Ten Commandments, it has an atomized approach, seeming to attack the trembling conscience from all angles. It does nothing to educate the conscience on the Church’s social teaching; the words “war” “poor” “gun” “violence” “climate” do not occur. The general effect is one of narrow, individualistic anxiety.
Just as we need a mirror to examine our looks, we need an outer text to hold up the mirror to our souls. Otherwise an examination of conscience risks spiralling into the cultivation of obsessions and ambitions that have no relevance to the call of the Gospel but lock us into the self-centred cocoon out of which the shocking scenarios of Ss Matthew and Luke would awaken us.
Why not take the Gospel itself as the mirror for conscience? Some might find the Gospel just as narrow and bruising in its impact on conscience as any other set of laws. But note that it brings out its fiercest rhetoric in connection with the sin of selfish neglect of and indifference to the needs of our neighbour. Luke’s very Jewish fable of the rich man and Lazarus centres on a kind of revolution in which the exploitative rich are humbled and the wretched beggar exalted. The scene of last judgment in Matthew 25 similarly projects an eternal separation of sheep and goats according to whether they have seen Christ in their suffering neighbour.
Charity can be put at the centre of conscience in a more gentle way, as in the beautiful evening prayer of Les petits freres des pauvres:
Avons-nous vécu, Seigneur, cette journée selon Toi?
Avons-nous été patients, humbles, aimants?
Avons-nous été attentifs à tous ceux qui venaient?
Avons-nous répondu à l’espoir
De ceux qui demandaient?
Avons-nous embrassé ceux qui pleuraient?
Avons-nous souri de tendresse
Jusqu’à ce qu’ils sourient à leur tour?
Avons-nous donné des fleurs avant le pain?
Avons-nous fait éclater ta joie?
Avons-nous été des frères pour nos frères?
Si nous n’avons pas fait tout cela, pardonne-nous.
Et même si nous l’avons fait, ce n’était pas assez.
Aussi nous te prions:
Embrase-nous d’amour chaque jour davantage.
Pope Francis’s Laudato si’ is, among other things, an examination of conscience that awakens us to our duty of care for the earth. I had never thought of such a thing until I heard Fr Seán McDonagh talk of the ecological crisis in 1984 at a conference held by Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture. Referring to Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (1962), he spoke of the extinction of species, the destruction of the rain forests, and other threats to the survival of the planet. Fr Peter Milward objected that “Nature is never spent./ There lives the dearest freshness deep down things” (G. M. Hopkins). But indeed the present ecological consciousness is far more pressing that anything Hopkins could have envisaged. The poem deserves to be quoted in full, since it does express “care for the earth”:
The world is charged with the grandeur of God.
It will flame out, like shining from shook foil;
It gathers to a greatness, like the ooze of oil
Crushed. Why do men then now not reck his rod?
Generations have trod, have trod, have trod;
And all is seared with trade; bleared, smeared with toil;
And wears man’s smudge and shares man’s smell: the soil
Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod.
And for all this, nature is never spent;
There lives the dearest freshness deep down things;
And though the last lights off the black West went
Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs —
Because the Holy Ghost over the bent
World broods with warm breast and with ah! bright wings.
In fact, Laudato si’ (to which Fr McDonagh is said to be a major contributor) is not all in the key of crisis, but is rather dominated by a celebration of the glory of creation in the manner of St Francis of Assisi. While some ecologists nag us about our failures and crimes in regard to the environment, Pope Francis cleaves to his patron of Assisi in continuing to proclaim “the joy of the Gospel”. He claims that no natural phenomenon lacks a purpose and that God is present in all. The text makes no mention of the vast reaches of the cosmos, the “eternal silence of those infinite spaces” which might thwart a blissful panentheism. The focus is on the earth, portrayed as our mother.
I first heard that a new season has been added to the liturgical year only at the start of September (at the associationofcatholicpriests.ie website). Alongside Advent, Christmas, Lent, Eastertide, we are now invited (especially by Pope Francis) to celebrate a “Season of Creation” running from 1 September to 4 October and centred on care for the earth, in the double sense of concern for its state and love of its God given splendour. I asked two congregations if they had heard of it, and almost no one had, though I am told it is observed in Spain (recently ravaged by wildfires). The idea originated in the Orthodox Church and was promoted by the World Council of Churches. A Swedish Lutheran priest told me that it is celebrated all the way to the end of the liturgical year in her church. It would be a great pity, another lost opportunity, if this remained a dead letter. To entwine ecological awareness with gospel piety enriches both of them, and saves the word “evangelical” from contamination by the mindset that sees the climate crisis as a hoax. A good way to develop an ecological conscience would be to study the very long text of Laudato si’ in groups, in a contemplative style. This would also be an ecumenical achievement, since the ecological worry is common to all Christians.
Let’s hope that our Catholic conscience ceases to be morosely individualistic and takes up instead the major concerns with justice, peace, and now the environment, which give our Gospel a broader engagement with the real world.
We are now experiencing the environmental crises and witnessing its devastating effect on the poor. We are also beginning to witness one of the negative effects of AI.
We have entered “post labour economics.” Household income is under threat as cut-backs are announced and pink slips handed out. Faced with these rapid and drastic changes we will be forced to change from me to we.