Brendan Hoban: General election campaign never caught fire              

Western People 10.12.2024

In the pause after the election campaign concluded and the last seat was filled, politicians and public drew a collective breath. Assessments included Not very memorable and Much ado about very little. Indeed very little seemed to catch fire except maybe the parable of the late evening incident in Kanturk.

My own verdict was that there was something strange about the whole campaign, almost a sense that it wasn’t connecting with reality, that it was more like a play with the actors hamming it up for their own supporters.

The RTÉ debate was a case in point. There was a strange atmosphere to it. The three leaders squeezed together, almost sitting in each other’s pockets and in contrast the two interviewers presiding on an outsized podium. Something wasn’t quite right.

Even the oft-repeated RTÉ mantra that ‘one of the three will be Taoiseach’ didn’t make sense. Technically, yes. But effectively, no.

While Micheál’s and Simon’s credentials for the top job were obvious, there was something of a question-mark around Mary Lou’s participation. Of course it was ‘the Leaders’ Debate’ and it couldn’t have happened without her but her participation was, to a large degree, symbolic.

It’s not that I question her right to be judged as a leader on a par with her two male colleagues. After all, the polls at this point had clearly indicated that there was hardly a hare’s breath between the three of them. No one could say that the two men and the one woman were not the three people in Ireland who had the right to be recognized and respected as the three main political leaders in Ireland today.

It was, however, a different question as to whether all of the three would or could be the next Taoiseach. Clearly either Martin (probably) and Harris (later on) are expected to be the next Taoiseach but that couldn’t be said of McDonald.

In Ireland, the purpose of general elections is to ensure that a government is available to run the country for the next five years. And the party (or parties) that gets to run the country are those who can provide the requisite number of elected TDs plus a few more who can ensure that whatever decisions the government makes can be reliably voted through. 

Martin and Harris have made it clear that they are prepared to join in a coalition with another party or parties that share their policies and clearly one or other will be the Taoiseach. 

But the question that hung over the Leaders debate was that while Sinn Féin (SF) was willing to lead a government what they were bringing to the table wasn’t enough to provide a government. It was the equivalent of someone proposing to make a cup of tea while everyone knows that they have no way of boiling the water.

Of course, Sinn Féin was prepared to lead a government but the total number of election candidates fielded was not sufficient – even if they were all elected – to form a government on their own.

Clearly SF would need to coalesce with other parties but despite the efforts of Richard Boyd-Barrett to establish a coalition of the Left (to be led by SF) his pleas generated a minimal response. Even though he was prepared to offer himself as an honest broker in organizing a Left or Centre-Left alternative to a Fianna Fáil/Fine Gael (FF/SF) coalition, no one wanted to know.

It wasn’t unexpected because the other parties – Left or Centre-Left or single issue – would present such a loose alliance and such a varied palate that it would hardly rate as a workable government. 

I don’t blame SF for trying to present themselves as on the cusp of an historic victory. The gods haven’t looked favourably on their recent history: in one election they watched in frustration as too few candidates didn’t take electoral advantage of an unexpected rise in support; in another, it could be argued they had too many candidates; their huge lead in the polls – from a high of 36% to a low of 18% in November – had evaporated months before the 2024 election; and in the run-up to the latest election a surge in their electoral prospects ran out of space and time.

On top of that they were deflected by a series of incidental mishaps – the Brian Stanley controversy, the abuse allegations against SF personnel – that fed into a conviction that another electoral opportunity was missed.

Understandably, SF were all over the shop and that had the over-all effect of leaving the RTÉ stage to Martin and Harris with no other credible government being offered and McDonald almost as a nominal representative of an unworkable alternative government in the debate.

It simply fed into the inevitability of another FF/FG government, which is set to extend FG participation in government to a possible unbroken 19 years spell and to confirm unapologetically a FF resurrection from the dead – from the political crucifixion of a recent election where they achieved 20 seats. For SF, however, a  20% showing, though down 5% on the last election, was a reasonable achievement in the circumstances.   

What is quite extraordinary is the apparent belief that somehow SF on 20% (as it turned out) has a right to be involved in government, a belief that Miriam O’Callaghan of RTÉ (by way of quite inappropriate questions in the Leaders’ Debate) seemed anxious to indulge. There are, as almost everyone knows, multiple examples to the contrary, as when FF, for example in the Haughey era, got 44% and there was no suggestion that it entitled them to a special dispensation from the rules.

The ballot box is a hard teacher. There’s no entitlement in politics. The hindsight prospect of an imagined coalition of the Left which is widely accepted as unattainable, impractical, unworkable and absurd in its ambition is an embarrassing venture for SF. Revamping, re-styling and detoxifying might render the party a greater service.

  • To mark my Local Media Award as Columnist of the Year 2024, I’ve published a compilation of 156 columns from the Western People in 2020, 2021 and 2022. It’s called Just a Thought and a limited number of copies are available at the usual outlets or online from mayobooks.ie 

Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.