Underestimating Love, which is the gospel’s core message

Article in The New York Times
I am a Catholic, born in 1921 of Italian and Irish families and raised in California seminaries. After decades of work as a priest, I was astonished that Pope Paul VI appointed me a bishop in San Francisco. I love my church, and every night I pray that I might die in her warm, loving arms.
Yet I worry about my church’s future. Basic doctrines will not change. But the church may change policies and practices after doing serious study.
So, as we await Pope Francis’ visit to America, I offer a peaceful contribution to the controversies that convulse the church today.
American Catholics are divided, primarily, by three internal church conflicts.
The first is over priestly celibacy. Observers within and outside the church point to mandatory celibacy as a principal factor driving down the number of American priests.
A celibate life is admirable for a priest who personally chooses it. For 1,000 years, great good has been accomplished because priests could fully devote their lives to their ministry.
Nevertheless, in recent years married clergy of other Christian churches have been accepted into service in the Catholic Church. So far, the ministry of these married priests has appeared successful.
The church should start relieving the desperate shortage of clergy members by also accepting for ordination men of mature age, of proven character and in stable marriages.
Optional celibacy allows a choice between an abstinent life, totally free for ministry, or a married life that enables better understanding of the lives of parishioners.
American Catholics are also divided over the ordination of women as priests.
Recent popes have said publicly that priesthood for women cannot be considered because the gospel and other documents state that Christ ordained men only.
Yet women have shown great qualities of leadership: strength, intelligence, prayerfulness, wisdom, practicality, sensitivity and knowledge of theology and sacred Scripture.
Might the teaching church one day, taking account of changing circumstances, be inspired by the Holy Spirit to study and reinterpret this biblical tradition?
Finally, why is a divorced Catholic who has remarried denied the Eucharist? Such people are considered living in an irregular union.
Valid marriages remain indissoluble. However, in confession a priest, after reviewing the circumstances with a remarried penitent, already can assist that person to develop a clear conscience with God and resume receiving the Eucharist.
Last month, Pope Francis stated that divorced and remarried Catholics were “not excommunicated,” perhaps suggesting that prohibition of the Eucharist is under review.
In surveys today, the question “to what church do you belong?” increasingly prompts the answer “none.” Polls show that many high school and college students have gradually come to believe that what they learned as children about the nature of God can be erased as readily as Santa Claus and the tooth fairy.
The culture that surrounds them focuses on science, growing out of the long history of Copernicus, Darwin, Freud, Einstein and Hawking. Still, most young people become not atheistic but agnostic, still searching even as they entertain doubts about God.
Pope Francis prefers the simple title “bishop of Rome.” So I ask my brother bishop: Should we not convene a third Vatican Council just as ethical and paradigm-shifting as Vatican Council II of the 1960s?
A Vatican Council III would bring together the world’s bishops under the unifying guidance of Peter. It would include representative major theologians, scholars of sacred Scripture, scientists and appropriate academics, lay people of all ages, clergy members and parishioners, and officials of other faiths.
In addition to the three issues dividing the church, this council and future councils would explore the morality of world economies, spiritual life, human sexuality, peace and war, and the poor and suffering.
Such a council might slow or reverse the flow of the faithful out of the church. It would also stimulate a new conversation about God, one that shows young people that God is not an old man with a long white beard. God is infinite and unlimited.
This is not easy to grasp. God is incomprehensible to our finite minds. We surmise that God is spirit, straddling the universe and parallel universes. At the same time God is intimate to each of us. We cannot prove existence by reason, nor can science disprove God’s existence.
Moreover, faith and science are not in conflict.
Many of the young say they relate to God personally and do not need a church. We applaud this personal relationship, but it is also truly human to do things in community: We party together, we play sports together, we enjoy meals together. The three generations of my own nieces and nephews are just as moral as I am, if not more so. Could it be that they know more clearly what Pope Francis has been asking of us for the past two years — to be more loving and accepting?
What caused much of the church over the centuries to underestimate the gospel’s core message, which is love? After the emperors Constantine and Theodosius embraced Christianity in the fourth century, one strain in the church developed a spirit of power and dominance, seen most clearly in the Crusades and the Inquisition. Many, including Pope Gregory VII, tried heroically, but unsuccessfully, to stop this trend.
Therefore, the main challenge facing the church today is not simply to resolve questions like celibacy, but to relearn how to communicate a deeper, more intelligent, more relevant religion that leads to a life of acceptance and love.
Francis A. Quinn is the retired bishop of Sacramento

Similar Posts


  1. Con Devree says:

    There is no study anywhere that shows conclusively that celibacy is the cause of the shortage of priests. Intuitively, the answer is a lack of faith. In terms of the “1000 years theory” it can just as well be concluded that mandatory celibacy was introduced to improve things.
    The main function of a priest is to seek to understand God, not married life. If he is close to the former, God will look after his ministry to married couples.
    I would consider the woman in my life as being characterised by “strength, intelligence, prayerfulness, wisdom, practicality, sensitivity and knowledge of theology and sacred Scripture.” But Christ never intended her to become a priest. She preaches that. It is Christ who gives vocations, not the local public.
    Darwin, Freud, Einstein and Hawking all proved or in the case of Hawing will prove to have been superseded by later scientists. Any intelligent young well-taught youngster would find not grounds in them for opting for atheism. The bishop forgets that it is natural for people to seek God. Many are choked by the thorns. His job is to supply them with the truth of God. This is a corner stone of love. When we love God we love truth, love, beauty, wisdom, God’s creation especially our neighbour.
    A priest cannot forgive any act in confession that is deliberately going to be repeated.
    Vatican III. Perhaps, but truth, the teaching will not change. The bishop’s sounds like the United Nations with the Pope and a few bishops thrown in.

  2. Mary Vallely says:

    “Could it be that they know more clearly what Pope Francis has been asking of us for the past two years — to be more loving and accepting?”
    It is Jesus who is asking and Francis is simply reminding us!
    I am glad that the bishop has learned from his nieces and nephews but what a pity that bishops, either about to retire or expire, suddenly find their voice and their courage. It’s a lovely, warm, heartfelt article, all the same. Better late than never.
    I wish him well in his retirement and to keep engaging with his young relatives. We can all learn from youth’s acceptance of the differences that don’t really matter in the long run.

  3. Eddie Finnegan says:

    Mary@2 – Francis Quinn wrote this article a few days after his 94th birthday. He has been a most enlightened man all his days, both as Bishop of Sacramento and in the nearly twenty years of his “retirement”. I don’t suppose +Timmy Dolan or that fellow Cordileone in San Francisco will arrange a flight over to the East Coast this week to allow the two Francises to meet for a chat. Francis Quinn is not one of those released bishops who become demob happy and loose of the tongue just when they pass the 75-mark. As for his “retirement”, this link gives an indication of what he thinks retirement is for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Quinn
    I believe Paddy Ferry may be a fan of +Francis Quinn too.

  4. I was about to explain to Con@1 above that, in actual fact, in the early church the concept of “vocation” did not mean a call from God or Christ but rather it was, actually, a “call” from the “local public” as Con refers to it. Two of the most famous examples being the call to Ambrose from the community in Milan even though Ambrose was not even baptised at the time. He was a civil magistrate. One of the other famous examples of the call from the local people was to Augustine from the community in Hippo. Augustine was reluctant to accept because he had only recently converted.
    However, this man, Prof. Gary Macy in the article in the link below, from today’s NCR, explains it much better than I could ever hope to.

  5. Mary Vallely says:

    “Give me the ability to see good things in unexpected places and talents in unexpected people, and give me the grace to tell them so.” (from Francis Quinn’s Retirement prayer.)
    So, thank you, Eddie, @3, for enlightening me. I did the bishop a disservice in my foolish assumptions. He seems to have led an exemplary life, fighting for social justice, promoting lay people and especially women in leadership roles etc; a true alter Christus. 🙂

  6. Con Devree says:

    I am accepting your version of events, because you say it and because it is not surprising. I remember one person suggesting to me once that I consider the ordained priesthood. have never put this on a resume! Bliss it was to engage with someone who didn’t know me. The person was mistaken.
    Many priests tell of being approached by someone in this way and discerning on foot of this. God calls people in different ways. Some of the most unlikely guys become great priests. Take the 12 Apostles.
    One presumes that Ambrose and Augustine were too erudite to decide solely on the basis of the opinion of their neighbours. It has been claimed that some priests in the past decided on bases akin to this and that the decisions were not well grounded.
    The vocation to the ordained priesthood has a certain mystery attached because of its extraordinary nature. One of the reasons, (I emphasise “one”) for the fall in vocations is that the said vocation has been dumbed down by many people including priests themselves.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.