|

Big Tobacco Flexes its Muscles

At the moment we are witnessing an extraordinary event. Big Tobacco, in the guise of Japan Tobacco International (JTI), is planning to take the Irish government to court over its attempts to introduce plain tobacco containers.
Dr. James Reilly, the Children’s Minister in Ireland has adopted this position as a way to further reduce the number of smokers in the country. Minister Reilly pointed to the fact that in Ireland 5,200 people die each year from tobacco-related diseases. The tobacco industry dispute the claim that plain packaging leads to fewer smokers.  In Australia, where plain packaging was first introduced, John Player circulated data recently which shows that in the 12 -17 age-cohort tobacco use grew by 32 percent since plain packaging was introduced in 2012. [1] Many question these figures, and wonder why they plan to take the Irish government to court if plain packaging will increase their sales!.
Cigarettes are very expensive in Ireland, compared to other countries. In December 2014 a packet of 20 cigarettes in Russia cost €1.56; €0.92 in Belarus; €1.03 in the Ukraine and €3.53 in Poland. In Ireland, a packet of 20 cigarettes costs €10. Even though €7.87 is paid in excise duty and VAT the profits are still huge.
At the behest of the Irish Heart Foundation and the Irish Cancer Society, Professor Rob Branston, from the Department of Economics in the University of Bath in Britain, has conducted an extensive study of the economics of tobacco in Ireland In 2011, Branston found that their combined revenue reached €226.5 million. The profits were in the region of €104.3 million which represents a 46 percent profit margin. Branston believes that “their profit margins (in Ireland) are astonishing.”[2] Profits from cigarettes are 46 percent compared to 20 percent for normal consumer goods.
A lot of comment on the JTI threat to the government has come from the medical profession. In The Irish Times (February 18th 2015), Dr Ross Morgan chairperson of ASH(Action on Smoking and Heathl) Ireland wrote that “he was not surprised Big Tobacco is now threatening our Government with legal sanctions. These kinds of bullying tactics are standard practices for the tobacco industry all around the world. It is imperative that our government stands first against such tactics and introduce what has been well established in Australia to be a progressive and positive health legislation.”[3]
Another letter in the same paper came from four Registrars in public medicine in Dublin. Dr. Ronan Glynn, Dr. Elyce McGovern, Dr. Chantal Migone, Dr. Lois O’Connor wrote that “JTI cited its direct employment of 100 people in Ireland and its tax payments of more than €665 million in 2013. JTI will not have mentioned that it is smokers who pay the tax and that JTI makes about €15 million net profit each year from those who are addicted to its products. It will not have discussed the cost of premature deaths due to smoking-related diseases in Ireland – estimated at over €3,500 million per annum.” They then address Danny McCoy, chief executive of the employers’ union IBEC who expressed concern at the proposed legislation and has asked that its passage be paused. “This approach disregards the cost of smoking to employers; productivity losses and long-term incapacity due to smoking-related diseases cost the Irish State over €160 million in 2009 alone. One in every two employees who smoke will die as a result of their habit.” Finally, the letter states that “ Plain packaging represents the logical evidence-based next step in tackling smoking-related disease and is crucial if the Government is to achieve its aim of a tobacco-free Ireland by 2025.” [4]
One other spin-off is that organisations such as The Irish Cancer Society plans to reject donations from legal firms which are supporting the tobacco industry in threatening court action on the States to block plain packaging of cigarettes. In   2013 and 2014, The Irish Cancer Society received €20,000 from Arthur Cox, one of Ireland’s most influential law firms, which is acting for the tobacco companies. This company is also the legal adviser for the Health Service Executive (HSE). Many people see a conflict of interests in having Arthur Cox working for both HSE, which trying to promote health, and JTI which is undermining public health. No religious person has become involved in this controversy.
Religious people do comment on alcohol miss-use, but not on cigarettes. I wonder why, because every time you use tobacco products as described by the producer you harm yourself and those around you.
Fr. Seán McDonagh, SSC
 
[1] Arthus Beesley, “Tobacco firm threat an intrusion into the political process,” The Irish Times, February 18th 2015, page 6.
[2] Sarah McCabe, “No smoke with ire; Big Tobacco gets angry,” The Sunday Independent, February 22, 2015, page 6.
[3] The Irish Times, February 18th 2015, page 15.
[4] Ibid

Similar Posts

A gathering of peoples

Articles
0 Comments

Chris McDonnell responding to Brendan Hoban’s article and recent events sees hope in the meeting of Pope Francis and Hindu priest Kurakkal Somasundaram and its message of “peaceful understanding between peoples, of religious tolerance and of care not to offend.”
However the reality of the world is that some will continue to go on insulting anyone they choose and “This is the reality we must live with, always willing to respond to what we perceive as unjust comment, always preserving the right for opinion to be expressed, but always careful that violent reaction is not the outcome of thoughtless words.”

Laudato Si and the Path to COP 22

Articles, Creation / Ecology
1 Comment

Seán McDonagh, SSC reports on a Joint Consultation on ‘Laudato Si’ and the Path to ‘COP 22’ organised by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences.
He quotes Prof. Ramanathan Veerabhadran as saying “the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming is the most important environmental issue facing the world today.”
“At the end of the meeting the group released this document in preparation for the COP 22 which will take place in Marraakesh from November 7 to 18th 2016.
“ The Paris Climate Agreement is historic. For the first time since the signing of the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), all countries have agreed to act in order to protect the planet. The core goals include: (1) keeping warming to “well below 2-degrees C” and “to pursue efforts to keep below 1.5-degree C”; (2) enabling countries to adapt to the adverse impacts already underway; and (3) ensuring the flow of fair and equitable financing to achieve the climate goals.”

Rare Steak not rare enough

Articles, Creation / Ecology
5 Comments

Seán McDonagh, drawing on the wisdom of ‘Laudato Si’ brings to our attention the impact the consumption of meat is having on Humans and the Global Environment.
“We might think that this generation is merely following the tradition of our ancestors when it comes to eating meat. In reality the global meat industry has grown dramatically in recent decades. Between 1963 and 2014 meat production globally has grown from 78 million tons to 300 million tons.”
“to reach a healthy level of meat consumption, citizens of the United States would have to cut their meat consumption by two-thirds, while in Britain and Ireland we should be eating half as much meat as we do.”

Who would want to be a bishop?

Articles
1 Comment

With a seeming hiccup holding up the production line of new bishops, {five appointments in the waiting line}, Brendan Hoban asks in his weekly column “who would want to be a bishop? “
A little tongue in cheek he suggests ” a few of us might even at this late hour be prepared, for the good of the Church and reluctantly, of course, to accept high office though in advanced years, …. So if the nuncio is really, really stuck, I have a few in mind who would loosen things up a bit.”

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.