Bishops are free to publish their ad limina reports; but they prefer to keep them secret

Bishops are free to publish their reports; but they prefer to keep them secret

Three years ago the Association of Catholic Priests, the Association of Catholics in Ireland and We Are Church Ireland, wrote a joint letter to all the Irish bishops requesting them to make public their quinquennial reports to the Vatican. These reports are sent to the Vatican a few months before diocesan bishops go to Rome for their meetings with the pope every five years (ad limina visits). They provide a detailed state of affairs of each diocese, according to a template supplied by the Vatican. This request was made jointly by the three groups to increase transparency and a greater involvement of all the People of God in every aspect of the church.

The result was extremely disappointing, but not surprising, as the response rate from bishops has always been very low. Out of twenty-six dioceses, only six bishops/administrators replied. None of the four archbishops acknowledged the request.

The few who responded said they would not publish their reports, claiming that it was personal, confidential and for Pope Francis only. However, none were able to cite church law to back up their claim that confidentiality prohibited them from publishing, as indeed there exists no such prohibition in canon law.  Bishops are quite free to make their reports public. It is just that they choose not to.

Reports by bishops are meant to give an honest, transparent and detailed account of the current state of their diocese. They cover everything from basic statistics (Catholic population, baptisms, marriages, funerals, etc.) to financial status, relations with other religious communities, civil society and public authorities as well as responses to child sexual abuse, pastoral challenges and prospects for the future of the Church. They are comprised of twenty-two sections, roughly corresponding to each office of the Roman curia who will examine them, and can run to several hundred pages for the very large dioceses.

Coincidentally, at the very same time that the Irish bishops were intent on keeping their reports hidden from the eyes of their faithful people, Archbishop Albert LeGatt of St Boniface diocese in Canada released his report to the general public.—English-version-for-Website.pdf

When questioned he said that while these reports had typically been shared only with the Vatican, there is nothing secret about them. ”It just came to me that this is, in terms of communication, a very complete reflection of where the diocese is. Since that’s what we are trying to communicate all the time with our faithful and our priests, why not use this? It is inviting the faithful of the diocese into a sense of what the Church, at this time, in this place, is called to be – which is evangelizing”

It is also noteworthy that Archbishop LeGatt didn’t wait for his return from his ad limina visit to Rome to post his report on the archdiocesan website but did this two weeks beforehand, on St Patrick ‘s day 2017.

He stressed that he was making use of modern technology at his disposal: ”We have the website – it’s free, it’s easily accessible. Why not use the means at our disposal for the advancing of the life of the Church and the kingdom of God?”

Archbishop Legatt confirmed that he had received no negative reactions from the Vatican, and a great many thanks from people back home. It is still on the diocesan website.

A quick search on the internet shows that the ad limina Report for the Archdiocese of Grouard-McLennon, Grand Prairie, Alberta, Canada (2006-2016) has also been published online by Archbishop Gerard Pettipas CSsR.

Bishop John Ifeanyichukwu Okoye for the Diocese of Awgu (2007-2017) in Nigeria has also done so.

Good governance demands that the prevailing clericalist culture of secrecy must end. The Church is not a corporation and these reports are not sensitive commercial information. Accountable and transparent behaviours are not optional courtesies or favours but rather necessities in a faith community of brothers and sisters in Christ.

The International Church Reform Network (ICRN) has recently produced a Charter of Rights and Responsibilities for Christ’s Faithful. Article Six on information states that ”Every Catholic has the right of unlimited access to information, except where there are legitimate concerns regarding confidentiality, privacy and the good name of others.”

The Irish bishops may now want to reconsider their opposition to transparency and release publicly their reports. Failure to do so would raise inevitably the question as to what is being hidden from the faithful and make any talk of synodality hollow.

Soline Humbert

18 June 2020

Similar Posts


  1. Colm Holmes says:

    A very interesting response from one of our readers:

    What really struck me is the mention of the letter/ response that the 3 groups, WAC, ACI, ACP sent to all the Irish bishops 3 years ago.

    In 1979 I was in the first class of BA Theology students to enter Maynooth. To say we were keen would be an understatement…. The pope had just left Ireland the week before we started our studies. There were 18 of us, 12 lay people, 5 sisters and a christian brother.

    In 1983/84 some of us formed a graduates association and one of the first things we did was write a letter to the Irish Bishops talking about ‘follow up’ to the pope’s visit, the need for youth ministry and the need for improved/ new links between our young secondary school students and their parishes. We were so enthusiastic we offered our time, services etc free to help with developing the same…. (after our day’s work teaching RE in schools throughout Ireland).

    We spent a long time putting our letter together, (it was pre email days!) and it was hard work but eventually it was done to everyone’s approval, photocopied and posted. We sat back and waited… we are still waiting. I think we got about 4/5 ‘holding replies – Bishop x has noted receipt of your letter…. And then silence.

    It was the start of a very very steep learning curve. At the time it was all the more shocking to us as many of the hierarchy were regulars on radio/ TV and engaging youth, laity and women were favourite topics and all the soundbites were positive!

    So nothing has changed in 40 years, I suppose the older wiser me knows this but it’s still a shock to read it as you put it and more so when ACP representing hundreds of priests are involved. It is so sad and so un necessary to treat people like this and so arrogant.

    Thanks for all you do and see you online at a future event.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.