Clarification in view of some Media Comment
The Association of Catholic Priests has not called for a postponment of the Eucharistic Congress.
That was a personal suggestion made by me in an article in the Irish Times.
Tony Flannery
Similar Posts
Quo Vadis? — Mary McAleese speaks
Mary Cunningham suggests that Mary mcAleese’s interview with Pat Kenny provides ‘food for thought’
Irish priests: Guilt by association is unfair and unjust (Irish Times)
The editorial in today’s Irish Times, following the Annual General Meeting of the ACP, is interesting and is to be welcomed, even if it is, to be honest, somewhat of a surprise.
Lay reform groups discuss equality of women, church governance at international meeting
Sarah Mac Donald, a freelance writer based in Dublin, reports for NCR on the recent meeting of Catholic reform groups in Limerick.
Minutes of the Business Meeting at the AGM
Sean McDonagh presents the Minutes of the Business Meeting of the ACP that took place on Wed 5 Oct during the AGM
Schedule for “Towards an Assembly of the Irish Catholic Church”
Regency Hotel: Monday, May 7th; 10.30am to 4.30pm
(Under the auspices of the Association of Catholic Priests)
First Session: Naming the Reality.
- There will be four speakers giving short input.
- Followed by a general forum.
Tea/Coffee Break
Second Session: The Vision
- Three speakers outlining their vision for the Church.
- Followed by general forum.
Break for Lunch (available in the hotel)
Third Session: Where to from here.
A presentation of a statement, coming out of the morning sessions. This might contain something like the following:
- A call for a new model of Church
- Calling lay groups to work together to make this model a reality
- Asking that this process continue towards a full assembly of the Irish Church.
- This presentation will be followed by a general forum which, hopefully, will shape the final document.
This gathering is open to all, lay and clergy. At some suitable time during the day there will be an opportunity for lay groups and individuals to gather, with a view to looking at the possibility of forming some type of lay ‘umbrella group’ comprising of existing groups and interested individuals.
If you are planning to attend we ask you to register on this website, so that we will know how many are coming.
There is no charge for attendance, but lunch will be at you own expense.
Address by Brendan Hoban in Portlaoise: June 2nd
This is the talk given by Brendan Hoban to the Meeting of the ACP in Portlaoise on Thursday, June 2nd.
Hi, looks like the harm is done already. When I read the headlines on http://www.cinews.ie/article.php?artid=8820 I thought “the ACP has lost the plot”.
Headline: “In a press release, Senator Cáit Keane (pictured) said she supports a call made by the Association of Catholic Priests in Ireland’s request to postpone the event on the basis that she believes it is “not an appropriate time for an event such as the Eucharistic Congress to take place in this country.”
I think there is a case to be made for postponing the Eucharistic Congress, for one it is going to cost a lot of money when many parishes and people are cash strapped. Also there is very little activity about it so not sure how the outreach to local people will work – it could just be another case of photo ops for the favoured few and celebrations with the in crowd. If it is to work then everyone must be included and involved, our parish priest has not even mentioned it save for the time we were asked for money!! I do not feel part of it and I know many people feel the same way so if that is common that how can it help with renewal.
Perhaps this could be the spur to get the members, and especially the leadership group, of the ACP to reflect on what procedure is to be followed before a view strongly held by one or more members can become an official position espoused by the Association. My own view would be to urge caution in this regard. Only if something likely to prove controversial for other churchgoers is proposed for approval by the general membership – whether at a general meeting, or by a sounding of the members’ views, either by text or email; and if a majority are in favour of its being published as a suggestion from the Association of Catholic Priests, only then should it be so designated. Any other view publicly espoused by any of our members, and particularly by one of the leaders, should be clearly designated as “my personal view only, and not necessarily that of the ACP”. This should help us avoid any unnecessary splintering with the Association.
As it happens, I too would like to see a postponement of the Eucharistic Congress until such time as the Holy See decides to change its policy of appointing diocesan bishops in disregard of the wishes of the clergy and people of the diocese. Like Tony, I fear that holding the Congress without any visible sign of structural reform towards a more consultative church can all too easily seem like a consecration of the Status Quo, or even a vote of confidence in the church current hierarchic practice. But I’d only want that presented as an ACP suggestion, if 50%+ of our members took the same view.