|

Clogher priests acknowledge the fragility of priesthood

Clogher ACP delegates met once again on the 21st January in Clones. Seven priests were present, three sent their apologies, including Bishop Liam.
Discussing the usefulness of Clogher ACP, it was widely accepted that the gathering was most beneficial, the healthy regularity was one of its strengths, and while the numbers attending were always small, most felt better for having attended. The engaging discussions and conversation enabled the members to air topics that no other forum might provide. It was also felt that inviting a guest speaker always attracted an extra crowd. Bishop Duffy Emeritus Bishop of Clogher is to be invited as our next guest for our gathering on the 26th March.
It was felt by the gathering that the Pope Francis effect had eased the pressure on the ACP, many of the issues that have been channelled through the association in recent years no longer seem that urgent, where is the energy for the ACP at national level now? The flagship for the ACP was always Vatican II, and perhaps the spirit of Vatican II was never really developed by the ACP. Maybe that could now become our flag ship, to catechize, to educate on what we really do know about that great council we call Vatican II.
There was a great need expressed about getting nourishment for the soul, a lot of articles appearing in the Furrow and indeed the ACP website, they are not nourishing our souls, there is a tiredness about their content, and are simply not addressing ‘my struggles, my agenda, my ministry, our struggles, our agenda, our ministry’. There was an appeal to, ‘give us something for our soul’.
Priesthood Today, the recent collection of essays edited by Eamonn Conway, was suggested as something that might bring us nourishment and might form the basis for reflection for the ACP at Diocesan and national level. While Pope Francis is giving us all that great lift, the old mind-sets still need to be addressed, we still need to be disturbed.
Conscious of a number of brother priests off because of ill-health, the fragility of priesthood was acknowledged, and conscious of how future demands are going to stretch us more and more, and the anxiety around all this, an excessive sense of duty can ultimately diminish us, and so we need to develop a healthy sense of duty, and self-care is vital in all of this.
We also need to admit and acknowledge that the model we are using for any future planning is questionable, and while we now live through that transition of model change, we must keep the vision clear. At the moment clerical numbers dictate any future planning, this is our default position at the moment, but the people of God need to be part of any future planning, and that is an urgent task for we are not as yet genuinely involving and preparing the people for times ahead. With regard to the balance between a clerical mindset and a co-responsibility mindset, we are not at the tipping point. In fact some would suggest we are gone beyond the tipping point, where is the plan?
The term ‘Team’ is the way forward, clericalism doesn’t involve ‘team’, we must change that mind-set now, now is the time.
“Our next gathering of Clogher ACP will be held on Wednesday 26th March 2014 in Clones, it would be good to see you all there.”
 
 

Similar Posts

  • Bread and circuses during the Year of Mercy? No, grazie!

    Robert Mickens casts a critical eye on some of the planned events for the Holy Year of Mercy.
    To say he is not impressed might be to understate his view.
    Looking at two events, the commissioning of ‘missionaries of mercy’ and the displaying of the bodies of Saint Leopold Mandić and Saint Padre Pio of Pietrelcina for public veneration he says “Both of them are aimed, fundamentally, at one thing — getting people to go back to confession, a practice most Catholics gave up a long, long time ago. …… this is one verdict of the “sensus fidelium” that it seems the pope does not want to acknowledge.”
    The Holy Year of Mercy was announced “at a time when the world has never been more aware of its divisions or more uncertain about how to resolve its seemingly irresolvable conflicts and heal its apparently incurable wounds; when it has never been so incapable of achieving peace and bringing about reconciliation.
    The Holy Year is the pope’s attempt to help the world — but even more so the church — find the solution to this impossible situation. And he is convinced that it will only be done when people allow themselves to be healed by God’s mercy and then, in turn, offer it to others; when they allow themselves to be forgiven and, in turn, begin forgiving others.”

    Mickens states that most reasonable Catholics — Italians included — disagree with the need for such props and gimmicks the jubilee committee is using to promote the Holy Year.”

  • Should we give up on Christmas?

    Now that we’re as good as done with Christmas for another year is it time we evaluate how and when we celebrate the birth of Jesus?
    Just before Christmas, Father William Grimm writing in globalpulsemagazine.com asked was it time to drop Christmas. “We could re-adopt the ancient multifaceted feast of Epiphany. Or, we could just move the celebration of the Nativity to some other point on the calendar.”

  • On-going media coverage of our AGM

    Sarah Mac Donald reports on our recent AGM in the National Catholic Reporter.
    The stark, and all too real, picture painted by Brendan Hoban is extensively quoted. We can only hope that this article and other media coverage will encourage all to conduct ‘a reasonable conversation’ and consider the “right to consideration, acknowledgement, support, encouragement and, above all, respect,” that priests are entitled to.
    Brendan is further quoted; “Priests who have served the church for so long deserve no less and it’s time to start a reasonable conversation about this.”

One Comment

  1. Mary O Vallely says:

    As usual, it is a tonic to read a report from the Clogher ACP group. I don’t think any other diocesan ACP group publishes its report so full plaudits to the men of Clogher. I am always struck by their honesty and the fact that their bishop is part of these meetings and so it is a mutual support group for the ordained of the diocese. That’s a heartening sign to see.
    I agree that there is a need for more spiritual nourishment. We all need that. Perhaps that is what is lacking in the tone and content of articles and comments here especially lately when people have become tired of the negative. Not that the injustices need to be sidelined or forgotten -heaven forbid- but everyone needs to stop and breathe deeply into the presence of the Holy Spirit. Why else are we here?
    Old minds need disturbing? Yes, but I think the young minds need disturbing more from what I hear of a new support group of priests being formed. Hopefully, not in opposition but eventually coming together to share and support each other.
    “The People of God” seems an odd term, almost as if the laity (and you were probably trying to avoid that term) were a breed apart from the ordained/the clergy. Aren’t we all the people of God and if that was accepted into the mindset then that invitation to the next meeting in Clones on 26 March would mean exactly that, ALL or anyone?
    Again, thanks to Jimmy McP and the men of the Clogher diocese for sharing this report with the rest of us. It’s straight talking and refreshing therefore in its honesty. Bail ó Dhia ar an obair and keep ‘er lit, boys. 🙂

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.