Doctrine does Develop

http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/german-group-synod-united-church-doctrine-has-developed-over-time
The group of German speaking prelates attending the worldwide meeting of Catholic bishops on family — which includes a rather diverse range of what might be called progressive and conservative voices — has called on the gathering to recognize that church doctrine has developed over time.
The group has also said the church’s understanding of Jesus’ mission on Earth means that there cannot always be one universal principle that applies to all concrete situations.
Writing in their report on the discussions taking place in their small group for the ongoing Oct. 4-25 Synod of Bishops, the German bishops say: “It … became clear to us that we are too static and not biographical-historical in many debates and observations.”
“The Church’s doctrine of marriage was developed and deepened in history,” they write.
The group explains how the church’s understanding of marriage has developed over time — first emphasizing monogamy of marriage, then “the personal dignity of the spouses” before coming to understand the family as the “house church.”

“This historical path of deeper understanding is today also visible in the biography of many people,” the group writes. “They are first touched by the human dimension of marriage, in the environment of the Church they become convinced of the Christian view on marriage and from there they find their way to the celebration of sacramental marriage.”

“As the historical development of the Church’s teaching has taken time, so her pastoral care must also accord the people on their path to sacramental marriage a time of maturing and not act according to the principle of ‘all or nothing,’” states the group.
The German speaking prelates write in one of 13 reports from the different small discussion groups meeting during the Synod, separated by language preference. All 13 of the reports — the second of three expected to come from the Synod — were released Wednesday.
There is only one German speaking group at the Synod, which includes an incredible range of intellectual backgrounds.
Among those in the group are: German Cardinals Walter Kasper, who has proposed a “penitential path” for divorced and remarried persons to receive Communion; and Gerhard Muller, the head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and known to oppose that path.
Co-leading the group are: Austrian Cardinal Christoph Schonborn and German Archbishop Heiner Koch.
The report is written in German and is available in full at the Vatican website. Dutch blogger Mark de Vries has posted an English language translation.
Continuing in their reflection on the development of church teaching, the German group states: “The Church inevitably stands in the conflict between a necessary clarity in teaching about marriage and family on the one hand, and the specific pastoral task to accompany and convince those people whose lives only conform in part with the principles of the Church on the other.”
“It is important to take steps with them on the road to the fullness of life in marriage and family, as the Gospel of the family promises,” they write.
The group begins its report with an exploration of the relationship between mercy and truth, grace and justice — saying the concepts “are constantly treated as being in opposition to one another.”
“In God they are certainly not in opposition: as God is love, justice and mercy come together in Him,” they write. “The mercy of God is the fundamental truth of revelation, which is not opposed to other truths of revelation.”
“It rather reveals to us the deepest reason, as it tells us why God empties Himself in His Son and why Jesus Christ remains present in His Church through His word and His sacraments,” they state. “The mercy of God reveals to us in this way the reason and the entire purpose of the work of salvation. The justice of God is His mercy, with which He justifies us.”
A consequence of this understanding of salvation, the German speakers write, is that there cannot be one universal principle that accounts for all particular situations.
“It excludes a one-sided deductive hermeneutic which subsumes concrete situations under a general principle,” they state.
Quoting both St. Thomas Aquinas and the 16th century Council of Trent, they say that for both “the implementation of basic principles of prudence and wisdom to the particular and often complicated situations is pending.”
“This is not about exceptions to which the word of God does not apply, but about the question of a fair and reasonable application of the words of Jesus — such as the words about the indissolubility of marriage — in prudence and wisdom,” they state.
Using Aquinas’ seminal work Summa Theologiae, they quote the saint: “To prudence belongs not only the consideration of reason, but also the application to action, which is the goal of practical reason.”
 
[Joshua J. McElwee is NCR Vatican correspondent. His email address is jmcelwee@ncronline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @joshjmac.]

Similar Posts

  • What did Pope Francis achieve with the Synod?

    Articles, Synod on the Family
    12 Comments

    Massimo Faggioli reports on the outcome of the synod in http://www.globalpulsemagazine.com/news/life-begins-at-50/2070

    “Yet the final document, which received the quorum of the two thirds for all its paragraphs, is more cautious than the text of 2014.
    It is also silent on some important issues, namely the attitude of the Church towards gay people (except a weak passage on families with gay members).”
    “But in this sense the final relatio of 2015 is a document that gives us a picture of the Church – more accurately, of its bishops – that is closer to reality,”
    “The Synod also showed that much of the Catholic debate today is the expression of a debate between American bishops. The fact that they disagreed in public … is in itself surprising. It is the symptom of the extremism and sectarianism of some … but also the sign of Francis’ breakthrough in the American Catholic hierarchy.”
    “The Synod’s final document is important, but it says less about the future direction of the Church than Francis’ great speeches of October 17 (a new ecclesiological framework for a synodal Church) and October 24 (against the ideologues in the Church). This is why the Synod of 2015 will disappoint some liberals, but it is clearly a victory for Francis.”

  • Submissions for the Synod

    Articles, Synod on the Family
    3 Comments

    Attached are two submissions to the Synod.
    One from ACI and the second from AUSCP.
    The Association of Catholics in Ireland have provided a lengthy document and the AUSCP have provide a summary of what they say “U.S. priests with decades of family ministry have presented to the Vatican office for the Synod of Bishops on the family. The survey results, with responses from almost 600 U.S. priests, were presented today (April 10) to Msgr. John Abbruzzese of the Synod office”.

  • Does marriage mean exactly what we want it to mean?

    Articles, Synod on the Family
    5 Comments

    Brendan Hoban writing in the Western People wonders if marriage really only means what we want it to mean. Brendan says ‘The Catholic Church, it could be argued, has a similar problem. It makes a distinction between two kinds of marriage: ‘sacramental’ and ‘natural’.
    However this ‘may be an important one to remember when the October Synod reassembles in Rome. In short, marriage doesn’t have to be sacramental to be accepted by the Catholic Church.’

  • Synod of bishops – The pastoral challenges of the family In the context of evangelisation

    Pope Francis, Synod on the Family
    15 Comments

    Conclusion

    158. The extensive material submitted to the Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops is presented in this Instrumentum Laboris to promote the dialogue and development which is expected to take place during the Third Extraordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops. Clearly, the richness of what is contained in the responses and observations goes beyond what has been reported in these pages, which are intended to provide an initial reference point in synod discussion. To come to some idea of how to respond to the new demands in the People of God, the following three main areas are under discussion in the Church: how the Gospel of the Family can be preached in the present-day; how the Church’s pastoral care programme for the family might better respond to the new challenges today; how to assist parents in developing a mentality of openness to life and in upbringing their children.

  • Third commentary of the German language bishops’ group

    Articles, Synod on the Family
    0 Comments

    Mark de Vries in his blog ‘In Caelo et in Terra’ comments on and provides a translation of the third commentary of the German language bishops’ group at the Synod.

    Perhaps we can all learn from the German speaking bishops when they ask for forgiveness;
    “Here, a confession was important to us: wrongly understood efforts to uphold the Church’s teachings time and again led to hard and merciless attitudes, which hurt people, especially single mothers and children born out of wedlock, people living together before or in place of marriage, homosexually oriented people and divorced and remarried people. As bishops of our Church we ask these people for forgiveness.”

One Comment

  1. Prodigal Son says:

    The Synod is getting there. The German bishops and Cardinal Erdo are at one on what the German bishops term a “necessarily clear teaching on marriage and family.” The German Bishops preoccupation now is how to accompany “people and convince them, when their lifestyle only partly complies with the basic principles of the Church.” Everyone can agree with them that “The Church unavoidably finds herself in a situation of tension here.”
    With clarity on the teaching achieved in what seems to have been an upsurge of charity, we should pray that the Synod will provide direction as to how “the Church must walk [with them] on the path towards a life of marriage and family in fullness as the gospel of the family promises.”

    Reply

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.