Forever Moving On ….. But Never Stopping to Solve Problems

Students inspire the call for change.

Chris McDonnell CT Friday March 9th 2018

By the time these few words reach print, we will have moved on; that is the nature of our fast-moving world. There is no doubt that the Ash Wednesday atrocity in the Marjory Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, is likely to be seen as a watershed in the American story of the Second Amendment.

It was another significant marker in a long-standing story of gun availability to the ordinary citizen, the right claimed through the Constitution to bear arms. Unfortunately we are living in the time when the type of gun on sale has greatly exceeded the power of those in earlier years.

Living as I do in the UK, I find it inconceivable that teenagers, too young to buy a beer, can walk into a gun store and buy a killing machine intended for rapid fire in a war zone. But that is the case in the US. The story of Columbine (1999), Sandy Hook (2012) and now Douglas (2018) provides a litany of tragedy with young lives taken with indiscriminate ease and numerous families and communities left grieving. Altogether since 2013, there have been over 300 school incidents involving guns. It doesn’t bear thinking about.

Here in 1996, in Dunblane, a Primary School was attacked with significant loss of young children. The consequence was a considerable tightening of our gun laws and, thank goodness, there has been no further such attack. At the same time schools paid greater attention to their own security regarding visitors and general identity checks.

Not so, it seems, in the US. The cause of such horror is placed firmly on the weapon holder, not his legally easy access to the local gun store. The occupant of the White House blamed ‘mental illness’ and didn’t mention a word about his chosen weapon, an automatic AR15.

His speech to the National Rifle Association at the recent CPAC, (Conservative Political Action Conference) addressed his political grassroots, to loud, standing applause and cheering from his audience. A matter of political opportunism rather than Presidential leadership at a time of grief.

There was much in that speech that was despicable; I want to concentrate on one proposal, that teachers should be armed as first- responders in the classroom. The principle of such a suggestion I challenge. Having spent thirty seven years of my professional life teaching in schools, the last twenty four as a headteacher, I cannot imagine anything further from the vocation of teaching. Can anyone begin to contemplate a classroom shoot-out between an automatic weapon and a hand gun, drawn by a teacher in the middle of explaining maths to a group of youngsters? Were it to come about the first target would be the teacher if he or she were known to be possibly carrying a gun.

It would seem to be more appropriate to attempt to kill the attacker than to take measures to prevent the incident in the first place.

With the failure of ‘adult’ politicians to come up with a solution, the students have taken up the challenge. Across the US, they have taken the path of protest to the streets, demanding their voice be heard. They took their voice to the White House and met with the President who, clutching his crib notes, seemed to fail to understand the depth of their pain. Their articulate response has been to their credit, even though it was said that they were ‘actors’ bussed in for the purpose. Shame on that suggestion.

With their example, the NRA has begun to lose business endorsements, maybe a first indication of a change of tone.

The time has come for the principles of the NRA to be challenged and their political support for the Republican party to be called to question. The $21M dollars given to the 2016 Election Campaign was not insignificant.

What can the Church contribute to the discussion? At all levels our voice must be heard and a defining position taken. We are quick-and rightly so-to condemn abortion. This school crisis is also a matter of right to life and demands courageous action. A couple of days after Douglas High School, I wrote these few words.

Loss

He lay, sprawled on the floor
she lay, untidily beside him.

Two teenagers among many

attending High School class

lost to a killing machine

built only for killing.

 

Later, at a press conference

mention is made

of ‘mental illness’,

no mention is made

of the killing machine

he held in his hands,

no question is asked

as to why he held it.

 

Seventeen victims,

an eighteenth later stood

shackled, orange suited

in a county court room.

Not yet old enough to buy a beer

but old enough to purchase,

legally, his killing machine

and in his incapacity,

use it.

May they rest in peace

 

Similar Posts

  • Sharing a vision

    Jeannine Gramick writes in the NCR about meeting old friends at the annual conference of the Association of U.S. Catholic Priests in Chicago.
    “I had found them 40 years later — concerned about a Vatican II vision of church and yearning for a community with the same hopes and dreams for justice and peace. They seemed to have found this vision in Pope Francis and to have realized community in a group called the Association of U.S. Catholic Priests.”

    Is there any learning for ourselves to be gleaned from the experience of our U.S. friends in AUSCP?

  • The War against Francis

    Brendan Hoban, in his Western People column, writes about tensions that exist in church.
    “While the big battle – and battle it is – is going on in Rome, there are more minor skirmishes taking place at national, diocesan and parish level, between those convinced of the need to introduce sweeping changes in the Church’s laws and practices and those holding on grimly to the past.”
    “It is difficult to see how there can be any agreement between sides that are mutually and diametrically opposed to one another – sometimes to the point of bitterness – and every reforming effort by Francis is being fought tooth and nail, even reforms that are necessary for the very survival of the faith in parishes all over the world.”

  • Laudato Si and the Path to COP 22

    Seán McDonagh, SSC reports on a Joint Consultation on ‘Laudato Si’ and the Path to ‘COP 22’ organised by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences.
    He quotes Prof. Ramanathan Veerabhadran as saying “the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming is the most important environmental issue facing the world today.”
    “At the end of the meeting the group released this document in preparation for the COP 22 which will take place in Marraakesh from November 7 to 18th 2016.
    “ The Paris Climate Agreement is historic. For the first time since the signing of the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), all countries have agreed to act in order to protect the planet. The core goals include: (1) keeping warming to “well below 2-degrees C” and “to pursue efforts to keep below 1.5-degree C”; (2) enabling countries to adapt to the adverse impacts already underway; and (3) ensuring the flow of fair and equitable financing to achieve the climate goals.”

  • All that He made is good

    Fr. John Mannion in “Doctrine and Life” (Dominican publication) January, 2016 wrote about the dilemma that Gays present to the church.
    The traditional response was, he said, “fed by a historical separation …. between scientific advancement and Thomistic moral theology.”
    “The current theory explaining the biology of sexuality … has two complementary dimensions, one evolutionary, the other statistical.”
    Outlining this theory, he states, that it “explains the major sexual phenomena currently the focus of controversy in most societies”.
    “In medical circles, the curtain has irrevocably set on those who think that homosexuality is an illness which can be cured with psychological treatment.”
    John concludes that “We live in a country which still calls itself Christian but where the level of scholarship needed to bridge the gap between modern man and a heritage of thousands of years is often conspicuous by its absence.”

One Comment

  1. Kevin Walters says:

    My response to gun culture on another site in the USA; to

    ”As a teacher, I would rather be permitted to carry a firearm if it means I can protect my students, rather than locking the door of my classroom and hoping for the best”

    And by definition you encourage others to do the same. Most people in Europe/Uk view American gun culture with horror, as the idea of self-protection, as in kill or be killed, is outside of the vast majority of peoples normal comprehension, as in a way of life.
    One can only feel sorry for the next generation of young Americans who will have to live in a culture of fear, as in, ‘teachers’ are carrying guns’
    From this side of the Atlantic the mind boggles.

    The topic is so controversial I had to stop making comments

    kevin your brother
    In Christ

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.