In the Shadow of Prophecy
In the Shadow of prophecy
Chris McDonnell CT Friday July 12th2019
I am indebted to Richard Rohr’s daily meditation on the Net from the Center for Action and Contemplation based in Albuquerque, New Mexico for stimulating this week’s thoughts.
In his posting for July 2nd, he writes of the peculiar nature of the Hebrew prophets. It is not common practice in the Scriptures of other world religions for writers to be critical of their own religious belief and practice yet in the Hebrew Scriptures we find men who do just that. A“Prophet can deeply love their tradition and profoundly criticize it at the same time.” writes Rohr. He goes on to say –“In fact, it is their love of its depths that forces them to criticize their own religion. This is almost the hallmark of a prophet. Their deepest motivation is not negative but profoundly positive”
We would do well to apply those wise words to the prophets of our own time. Too often when critical voices are raised in the Church, the motive for speaking out is misunderstood. The critics are accused of disloyalty, provoking unrest and disturbance of faith. The ‘company men and women’ don’t create waves, they live with the status quo and so avoid disturbance that would otherwise be their lot.
But now and then individuals come along who have the courage to raise their heads above the parapet, to take the risk of asking the awkward, yet honest questions. That was the substance of last week’s reflection built round the questioning words of Don Cozzens. When there is a problem at home, which is the better choice? Do something about it? Or leave home? ‘Doing something’ may be far more difficult and challenging than walking away. Our Church is our home, why become homeless by our own volition?
Time and again the Gospels tell us that it was “the priests, elders, and teachers of the law” who condemned Jesus.
It is too easy for some to say, “You criticize the Church too much.” But that very action is a mark of our faithfulness to the pattern set by the prophets and Jesus. Rohr goes on to say, “I would not bother criticizing organized Christianity if I did not also love it.”
The ‘critical voice’ should not be seen as the ‘negative voice’. Criticism, managed in an open and honest manner is fruitful, it allows for reflection and readjustment where required. But it has to be done in a grown up manner, with transparency and honesty.
It is part of the on-going task of the Church, reflected in the title of Michael Winter’s book “Mission or Maintenance?” first published in 1973. Are we content only with the upkeep of the historical Church, when in fact we should be a Missionary people? We need to respond to changing circumstances or we will find ourselves talking in an empty room, facing a mirror.
One immediate area of concern must be an acceptance of the prophetic voice of women in the Church. They do so much yet they are not given the credit they deserve. Their courageous voice has been heard across the United States and other countries yet often they have been called to question and judged for their actions.
In a different world, we must be a missionary Church in a different way. None of this invalidates our heritage but demands that we recognize and respond to reality. Joni Mitchell’s song from the late 60s says it all in the final verse “I’ve looked at life from both sides now/From win and lose and still somehow /It’s life’s illusions I recall/I really don’t know life at all”. The certainty that we have all the answers prevents our asking important questions and in so doing seeking an honest response. Prophets exist in our time, they tell the story of what is and of what it might become. They do so fully aware of the consequences of speaking out, knowing that they will be ostracized and derided. For love for the Church, their home, they suffer the loneliness of rejection.
Even Francis has experienced the pain of the prophet. With the publication of the Agenda for the Synod of the Amazon to be held in mid-October, he has been accused by Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, of breaking with Catholic teaching. According to Brandmüller, the synod’s recently-published preparatory document “burdens the Synod of Bishops, and finally the Pope, with a grave breach with the depositum fidei”.
Yet the words of the prophet are found in strange places. As Paul Simon wrote in the Sound of Silence “The words of the prophets are written are written on the subway walls, tenement halls and whispered in the sound of silence”.
We just need to look and listen even in unexpected places and never forget to pray as we seek renewal in the Risen Lord
END
Well said, Chris. It is sad to see how so many prophetic voices are derided or ignored when we know that every human institution needs to learn to accept constructive criticism else it fails to grow and improve.
There are too many sensitive souls who take criticism personally and maybe we all need to offer that criticism in a more tender and tactful manner. However since there has never been an outlet for the expression of critical voices, of any questioning or any openness to the regular cut and thrust of debate within the Church is it any wonder that many go on the defensive and take any questioning personally.
it is disheartening to think that we have such a long way to go before we can learn both to offer criticism in a constructive and loving manner and to accept it in an equally loving and open manner. Still, never too late to learn.
Thank you Chris. You have reminded me that every time I criticise it (and I do so often) I qualify my remarks with the words “The Church I love”.