Irish Times Rite and Reason – Soline Humbert: Denial of a vocation to women isn’t just ‘discomfort’, it is spiritual abuse

Rite & Reason: Discomfort is a word I have never used to describe the reality of my situation in the church, nor have I ever heard it from other women

Soline Humbert

Sun Apr 05 2026 – 00:30•4 MIN READ

Link to article: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2026/04/05/denial-of-a-vocation-to-women-isnt-just-discomfort-it-is-spiritual-abuse/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQ_WQ1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEe4oHwK_fr9Ik2GsFJ-gHxqwBU5x6ygURPjEGqpknpf_3l5onQ2wt8WRxRwp4_aem_ibFsO1TgHYdR1zhhuXP35w

On Easter morning, the Risen Christ chose to appear first to Mary of Magdala. He commissioned her as his representative and spokesperson to “Go and tell” the Good News to the others.

Mary of Magdala is the first apostle, the “Apostle to the apostles”. So how is it women are still excluded from all ordained ministries in the Catholic Church?

Fifty years ago I was a student in Trinity College, agonising over a calling to the priesthood (presbyteral ministry). At the same time in Rome, Pope Paul VI was shutting down debate on the opening of the ordained ministries to women. He asked the all-male Pontifical Biblical Commission (of 20) to study what was deemed a new question: Can women be priests?

In April 1976 the commission’s unanimous conclusion was that the New Testament by itself didn’t settle the possible accession of women to the presbyterate.


The commission’s report was never published. We know of its deliberations only because its findings were leaked. A few months later, Paul VI declared, in his Inter Insigniores document, “The church does not consider herself authorised to admit women to priestly ordination.”

Lacking convincing theological arguments, it devolved to his successor Pope John Paul II to quash the issue, with Ordinatio Sacerdotalis in 1994.

Pope Francis called a Global Synod in 2021 for Catholics to listen to the Spirit in each other and to speak boldly. For many, this process of discernment of what the Spirit was saying to the Church included asking again about women’s ordination.

The issue of women deacons and priests surfaced in all dioceses in Ireland and in many other countries despite some attempts to filter it out as a settled immutable doctrine.

Last month, on March 10th, the Vatican released the Report of the Study Group on The Participation of Women in the Life and Leadership of the Church. As I read it, one word jarred. Repeated over and over, it caused me to stare in disbelief. “Discomfort”, as in: “some women experience discomfort in the church”.

Some Catholic teaching is ‘rancid’ and needs updating, says Mary McAleese]

Discomfort! Such a mild, safe word. No mention of pain, of suffering, of wounding. Discomfort is a word I have never used to describe the reality of my situation in the church, nor have I ever heard it from other women.

I remember a newspaper article headline to an interview I gave: “The agony of a vocation denied to women,” it read. This reflected much more accurately my reality.

Did any of the writers of this report read Out of the Depths about Ludmila Javorova? In 1970 she was ordained a priest by a Catholic bishop as part of the underground church in the then Czechoslovakia when that country was under Soviet rule and it seemed all but certain that Catholicism would be erased.

The denial of a vocation is not to experience “discomfort”. It is a severe wounding. I have described it as a crucifixion in a painting and a poem.

When Saint Thérèse of Lisieux spoke of her death at 24 as God sparing her the pain of not being able to be ordained, she was not talking of “discomfort”.

When the clerical child sexual abuse and cover up scandal first surfaced, we heard again and again from church leaders that they “didn’t realise how harmful it was to the children”.

Spanish Catholic group draws backlash over vote to exclude women in Easter procession ]

To use the word “discomfort” is to do something similar: it denies and minimises the profound harm done to women by what is a form of spiritual abuse.

To speak of women’s “discomfort” serves only to preserve the comfort of those responsible for a disgraceful situation which cries to Heaven for justice and remediation. There is little incentive and no great urgency when all that is at stake is a “discomfort” for women.

A Monsignor once asked me: “Surely the pain isn’t that bad?” All he wanted was to be reassured he didn’t really have to take responsibility. He is not the only one.

In a recent interview, Bishop of Down and Connor Alan McGuckian was asked about women who felt they are treated as second-class citizens in the church. He denied they were and added, as proof: “I didn’t consider my mother a second-class citizen, nor did she consider herself one.”

Obviously the feedback from so many women in the synodal process counts for nothing. He was adamant women would never be ordained. And then there is the bishop who said, “It’s above my pay grade.”

To all the churchmen who exhort us to be endlessly patient, I say: Where is your courage, when what is at stake is a matter of justice, of credibility of the church and faithfulness to the Gospel?

The Irish Synodal Pathway will hold its National Assembly on October 17th next, the feast day of St Soline, whose name I bear: a reminder that God calls us by name, not by gender. Now is the time, the kairos. What comes from the Holy Spirit cannot be stopped. Christ is risen and women are rising.

Soline Humbert is a spiritual director and the author of A Divine Calling: One Woman’s Life-Long Battle for Equality in the Catholic Church, (2025, The Liffey Press)

Similar Posts

7 Comments

  1. Dermot Quigley says:

    I was surprised to accidentally learn that, on June 1, 2021, Pope Francis approved a revised version of Canon law that explicitly criminalizes conferring Holy Orders on Women.

    Canon 1379 §3
    The text of the canon states:

    “Both the one who tries to confer a sacred order on a woman and the woman who tries to receive it, incurs a penalty of excommunication “latae sententiae” reserved to the Holy See; the responsible cleric may also be punished by exclusion from the clerical state.”

  2. Sean O'Conaill says:

    No man-made law can take precedence over the Great Commandments of love of God first of all, and then of love of neighbour. As women are equally endowed with the capacity to love, and the capacity to communicate these Great Commandments, the denial of sacramental equality is clearly arbitrary, the child of a male bias, not of love. It is also now an obstacle to the healing of the church and to the coming of the kingdom of God, as it replaces the Great Commandments with a canonical exclusion as the supreme law of the Church.

  3. Jo O'Sullivan says:

    Forgive me, Dermot, but I thnk the Canon Law argument is a straw man. In 1917, Canon Law forbade cremation. In 1993, it permitted it. Canon Laws have often been amended/changed. Well said, Soline, to point out how hurtful and insulting the use of the word “discomfort” is in refernece to women who discern deep in their very souls the call to ordination. God knows, if it were simply a matter of discomfort you, and so many others, would simply have accepted the discomfort and got on with living your lives. Another charge I imagine is hurtful to you is that women who hear the call of God to minister as the ordained, are power-hungry and want to “be in charge”. I think that says rather more about the people who make such accusations than it does about women who sincerely want to serve God’s kin-dom. Is that what you believe priesthood to be about?

  4. Gerry O'Hanlon says:

    I appreciate that this is tricky terrain for Irish bishops. But the public witness of Soline Humbert, apart from being rooted in a conviction of divine calling, requires great courage and a willingness to be vulnerable. Might not some senior churchmen respond in similar vein? Avoiding the topic or taking refuge in platitudes no longer suffices in a synodal era of open speech and generous listening.

  5. Paddy Ferry says:

    Well said, Sean, Jo and Gerry.

  6. Soline Humbert says:

    Thank you very much Seán, Jo, Paddy and Gerry. It is a universal pattern that whenever inconvenient suffering challenges dominant power it is denied,minimised,silenced and made invisible to be ignored and not disturb the unjust status quo. This is such a case in the church when a long standing patriarchal tradition is challenged by a (disturbing) reality over which it has no control: God’s call to women. Whether any Irish bishop(s) and the Irish Synodal Pathway can break free and engage courageously and meaningfully remains to be seen. But what comes from the Holy Spirit cannot be stopped. So we live in hope in this Easter season that this very large stone can and will be rolled away!

  7. Dermot Quigley says:

    I have never understood why very little attention is focused on Bringing Married Priests back into Ministry, if they so desire.

    I know two Priests of the Archdiocese of Westminster (I was at University with one of them) who left to get married. I also know that they would love to return to ministry and that their wives have no objection.

    Bringing Married Diocesan Priests back into Ministry presents no doctrinal issue. It wouldn’t solve the vocations crisis, but it would provide a little help to PPs who are run off their feet, managing two plus… Parishes.

    Such dispensations are up and running in other Countries.

    Why is this not being discussed by fans of Synodality?

    The fact that a Priest is married, makes not one iota of difference to the validity of his Mass, the absolution he would give in confession etc

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.