|

Remonstrating with Rome

There is good precedent for remonstrating with the Pope. The precedent goes back to “Get behind me, Satan!” (Matthew 16:23) and to St Paul (Galatians 2:11 – Paul uses Peter’s Hebrew language name Cephas). It’s only right that we should follow these examples.
Speaking the truth with love is commended by Lumen Gentium 37: Let it always be done in truth, in courage and in prudence, with reverence and charity toward those who by reason of their sacred office represent the person of Christ. This is confirmed in the Code of Canon Law, 212, #2.
Our Taoiseach is not the trailblazer from Ireland. In the Irish Remonstrance of 1317, Domhnall Ó Néill, writing for the Irish leaders, took issue with Pope John XXII at the injustices perpetrated by the English crown on the people and church in Ireland, which they said went far beyond any authority given by Pope Adrian IV (Nicholas Breakspear) in the Bull Laudabiliter. This protest was not to the Vatican, but to Pope John living in Avignon. Before Avignon, popes lived at the Lateran in Rome; only some time after the return from
Avignon did they move to the Vatican.
Just 344 years later, the Irish Remonstrance of 1661, promoted by a pro-crown Franciscan priest, Peter Walsh, protested that Pope Alexander VII did not have authority to interfere in the governance of Ireland. If Enda Kenny had spoken in 2005, we would have had another jump of 344 years. However, he would need something to distract the nation from the problem of election promises about Roscommon hospital. While the Taoiseach reflected a deep frustration of many with the Vatican, it’s a pity that he chose the wrong grounds for his complaint, and that it has been acted out in the closure of the Embassy in Rome.
President Michael D Higgins spoke at his inauguration about working for a “Real Republic”.  Remonstrating with Rome is just as necessary as Rome remonstrating with the church around the world, as we learn to become the Real Church, a Real People of God where every member of the Body of Christ is valued.
Pádraig McCarthy

Similar Posts

  • Third commentary of the German language bishops’ group

    Articles, Synod on the Family
    0 Comments

    Mark de Vries in his blog ‘In Caelo et in Terra’ comments on and provides a translation of the third commentary of the German language bishops’ group at the Synod.

    Perhaps we can all learn from the German speaking bishops when they ask for forgiveness;
    “Here, a confession was important to us: wrongly understood efforts to uphold the Church’s teachings time and again led to hard and merciless attitudes, which hurt people, especially single mothers and children born out of wedlock, people living together before or in place of marriage, homosexually oriented people and divorced and remarried people. As bishops of our Church we ask these people for forgiveness.”

  • There’s Something about Seminaries

    Articles
    2 Comments

    Maynooth seminary is still grabbing headlines.
    Tony Flannery, on his own website, gives a frank opinion of the most recent proposals put forward by the trustees. “Are these men serious? Do they expect this effort at very traditional regimentation, and equally traditional spirituality, to solve the problems they believe existed?”
    Brian Eyre, commenting from the remove of Brazil, sees merit in a proposal that “a subcommittee of lay people, families and “especially the presence of women” will be introduced as part of priestly formation”.
    Meanwhile Cindy Wooden, writing in America Magazine, reports on Pope Francis speaking in Krakow about the training of seminarians. Pope Francis is reported as saying “too many seminaries teach students a rigid list of rules that make it difficult or impossible for them as priests to respond to the real-life situation of those who come to them seeking guidance.” and “”We need to truly understand this: in life not all is black on white or white on black,” he said. “The shades of grey prevail in life. We must them teach to discern in this gray area.”
    Perhaps Maynooth’s trustees should consult Pope Francis?

  • “Sacred Language” or Trojan Horse?

    Articles, Liturgy
    17 Comments

    Fr. P. John Mannion critically evaluates the ‘new missal’.
    ” The fact of the matter is that the Roman Congregation responsible for the current translation, completely ignored the directives of Vatican Two, and gave us instead the Mass we were using since Pope Paul VI laced with Tridentine insertions plus prayers rehashed in a supposedly “sacred language” and translated from the Latin according to Rome’s directive “in a most exact manner” thus giving us a translation that is ungrammatical and laced with pious, phoney verbiage.”

  • The Ballot Be Yours

    Articles, Editor's Choice
    16 Comments

    Brendan Hoban, in his Western People column, counsels against the temptation of directing people how to vote in referendum or general election. “Been there, done that in the last two centuries. It made little sense then. It makes even less now.”
    “Telling people from the pulpit what to do in respect of a constitutional referendum or, even implicitly, who to vote for (or not to vote for) would do incredible damage not just to the cause espoused but to the Catholic Church”

2 Comments

  2. Sean McDonagh says:

    Today is the Feast Day of St. Columban. He wrote a letter to Pope Boniface IV challenging him to take action to restore the good name of the bishop of Rome.

    Reply

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.