Séamus Ahearne: ‘I wish I was as sure about anything as s(h)e is about everything.’ (Macaulay supposedly)

The Baftas and Joan Baez

Martin McDonagh made his wry comment at the Baftas. ‘The Banshees of Inisherin’ won the ‘Outstanding British Film’ of the year. He said that Rosie – the ass, came from Stoke-on-Trent which would probably qualify the film as British! It was said ironically. ‘Cailín Ciúin’ lost out. The very  name is a contradiction in terms! That was the likely reason for it to miss out. I had an unexpected pleasure last week (some time), I saw Joan Baez in Concert on Sky Arts. It was her 75th birthday celebration. It was quite brilliant and nostalgic. Her final song was with Paul Simon. Yes. Yes. I know she is now 82 but the song of her life, resonated with many of us. The past woke up.

Democracy – how are you?

The Wagner mercenary group in the Ukraine, reminds me of The Dirty Dozen or even The Black and Tans as we understood them historically. Putin and Biden spoke on Tuesday. They see things very differently. It does seem difficult to grasp how the invader can justify smashing up the Ukrainian people for some ideology of nationhood. Joe Biden’s words on democracy and freedom were powerful. However, there has to be a hesitation at his words, given what democracy means in modern-day America. It is embarrassing rather than illustrative of a better way. If we consider the protocol of Brexit too, it raises the confusions in democracy. It also reminds us of an imperialist nation taking over a country and then being incapable of extricating itself even now from the consequences of that invasion. The DUP want all the benefits of free movement of goods without customs and also want to have the benefits of the Union. The UK got out of Europe. It is then impossible to square the circle. Where does the notion of ‘politics being the art of the possible; the attainable; the next best’ (Otto v on Bismarck) come in? 

The Taliban and Scriptural fundamentalism:

The Taliban in Afghanistan have become Catholic. They have banned contraception!   If they would listen to us, we could tell them what a bad idea that is, and how damaging such a policy has been for us, as Catholics. We are taken aback at some of the behaviour of the Taliban and then of many Islamic fundamentalists. Our own regime (Church) in the past, was very fundamentalist and rigorist. There are elements of that still around. It is a worry to hear of the lassie Kate Forbes who put herself forward for the leadership of the SNP (after Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation). She is a member of the Free Church of Scotland who are rather precise and tidy in their faith. She is against same sex marriage (she has a point.) She is against the self-gender-identification which had been passed by  Holyrood – the Scottish Parliament (I understand that too). But this will not go down well too well with the general population. I do see in the Free Church and their attitude to Scripture, something of what we did ourselves, and what some still do, in their literal interpretation. The message and the story gets lost in the words. Should we send a message to the Taliban and advise them from our experience?

Andrea Bocelli on pilgrimage:

I missed it. Andrea Bocelli was due to be on Sky Arts on Monday 20th. I had accidently come on the programme the previous Monday 13th February as I was searching to see what the outcome was from Rishi Sunak’s visit to the North. Bocelli was delightful. He did sing. He rode around on a horse in company and chatted as he went along. He was on pilgrimage. He reflected on life. On faith. On God. On forgiveness. It was very special. It was steeped in values. It was inspirational prayer on horseback. I was sorry to miss the recent continuation of his pilgrimage. And ideal reflection for Lent…..

Indi and her flowers:

Indi was on a video. She was investigating her garden. The ground was hard. She had been very busy. What was she busy at? She had to talk to her father at work. She had her bike. She had to move the bike. She couldn’t dig up the ground. She then wanted to watch the flowers growing. She was disappointed that the growth was so slow. She wondered if she went to bed would they have grown by the morning. That is what she said. She has become argumentative with God. She is convinced God is playing games with her. She thinks it is unfair.

Spring and Lent:

The crocuses. The daffodils. The snowdrops. The bird sounds. Spring. The companionship of the ducks and the water hens and the swans. The heron and myself are silent partners. We have companionable quietness between us. We don’t have to speak. Spring does speak to Lent. It is new life. It is stirring the buds of our hearts. It is waking up the sleeping wonder of our selves. It is refreshment. Lent has often been taken over by the rigorists. We don’t need purple. We don’t need ashes. We don’t need to eliminate the alleluia. We don’t need to fast. We don’t need to give up things. That isn’t Spring-like. If we are to be an example to those who are to be received into the Church at Easter; all this that would hardly make us very attractive. Lent is that preparation for Easter and is our effort to freshen up and thereby encourage those who want to embrace the faith.

Cultural dissonance:

We are into the season of Confirmations and First Communions. Some 17 schools (Finglas) need to be juggled in our planning for those events. Many are clamouring for First Confessions. A few voices would want the Confirmation candidates to have Confession too. These celebrations are very special. However, we do have to note cultural dissonance. The children don’t know much about Church or our Liturgies. God is not an ever-present person in the heart of the homes. The parents have wandered away from religious culture. Their music of life is quite different. It can be frustrating for some of us, to see the work done in the schools (by the teachers) and the work done in the parishes, and yet to realise how useless it is. We have the niggling feeling that much of it doesn’t make sense.

The God of our yesterdays have gone walkabout. We are in mission territory. We haven’t failed. What is on offer is still beautiful but our language is fading into the past. We are back in school. We are learners of a new language and new culture. God and faith and grace has to find a new expression. Our Sacramental occasions have to pay attention to this new scene. Our Masses have to change. Our Rituals have to change. Our funerals have to change. Our notion of Confession has to change. Our idea of priesthood and ministry has to change. It is very frightening for many of us to delve into this new language. Nothing says that the past was wrong. All it shouts out at us is that the adventure of faith calls us to be real evangelisers. We too have to find God and prayer afresh. These are great days to be priesting!!!

Seamus Ahearne osa    23rd February 2023.

Similar Posts

2 Comments

  1. Paddy Ferry says:

    “The Taliban in Afghanistan have become Catholic. They have banned contraception! If they would listen to us, we could tell them what a bad idea that is, and how damaging such a policy has been for us, as Catholics.”

    Fair play to you, Seamus for having the courage to voice your honest concerns about Humanae Vitae.(HV)

    Mind you, you are in good company and definitely majority company. I used keep a close eye on research into the “reception” of the doctrine contained in Humanae Vitae and the last time I looked — probably ten years ago — 92% of practising Catholics, yes, practising Catholics, in Europe and North America (Canada and the US) did not accept the core teaching of HV.
    And, of course, we all know how vital “reception” is in the process of the authentication of catholic doctrine and teaching.

    The late Joe Dunn, God rest him, in one of those wonderful books he wrote, based on his Radharc experiences, told us that if you ever heard a priest or bishop reflect in a negative way on HV then they must be nearing retirement. The shock of remembering this really hit home when I read your piece, Seamus. You are surely not contemplating retirement!!

    Well, of course, I know you’re not. Thank God for Francis who will soon be celebrating 10 years in Rome. What a miracle that was on March 13th 2003.

    But, we must ask in all seriousness, was HV really damaging for us Catholics? It was certainly damaging for the power and credibility of our institutional church but many think it was a blessing in disguise for the ordinary Catholic people of God. It gave many the courage to question whether we could trust them on anything if they could get something so basic so disastrously wrong.

    In 1988, Weltbild, a very traditional German Catholic magazine surveyed its readership and only 12% of the faithful under 50 years of age and only 25% over 50 were willing to accept papal teaching on questions of sexual morality. Any teaching!
    The supplementary question was why and the answer from the vast majority — cannot remember the precise % now — was HV.
    If they could get it so wrong of that basic issue how could they be trusted on anything else? Could this be a true expression of the sensus fidelium?

    Goodnight and God bless, Seamus.

    Shalom.

  2. I remember the publication of HV and the stir it caused among the clergy and the laity. Many priests were disciplined, unfairly, because of their stance. However, very few people understood the wisdom of Pope Paul VI in issuing an encyclical rather than making a de fide statement. The encyclical was guidance for the individual conscience which had to consider all of the aspects involved. HIs primary concern was not to condemn birth control but to allow for the determination of the effects of “the Pill” on the body of the woman (he was certainly concerned with the dignity of the woman). The side effects were not well known and were still under investigation. Today we rarely talk of the side effects and yet we know more than was known in 1968. It was only with the advent of Pope John Paul II that we have come to view HV as mandatory rather than formative. We speak of concern for life from conception until natural death (except for the hypocrisy of the death penalty). Francis has tried to move the discussion back to a more central place by pointing out that “Pro Life” stance is not the only issue to consider. The discussion needs to be reopened and reexamined by a cross section of our best moral theologians and healthcare advocates.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.