Was Archbishop Martin Wise to Raise this Media Scrum?
Fr. Seán McDonagh, SSC
In recent times I have been writing about how climate change and how Ireland is not living up to its obligations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, especially in the area of agriculture. The situation with climate change is very serious. Scientists are telling us that 2015 was the hottest year on record, but that 2016 is expected to be even warmer. Climate change will lead to the death and displacement of millions of people but, unfortunately, our media and our politicians have been slow to grapple with it in an effective and competent way. It is only very recently that the leadership of the Catholic Church has begun to take the environmental degradation of the planet seriously. Then in June 2015, Pope Francis published an extraordinary encyclical on care of creation entitled Laudato Si : On Care For Our Common Home. Could it be that Ireland and the Catholic Church in Ireland was discussing this document early in August 2016? Unfortunately, the answer is would seem to be a resounding no.
In the social and economic sphere there are also serious challenges in Ireland today. Research by Oxfam Ireland has pointed out that the share of income going paid to workers has fallen as the size of the global economy more than doubled over the past three decades. The research confirms that Ireland was the most unequal country in the EU in terms of income distribution. These are very difficult times, especially, for young people today. Maybe the Irish public and the Catholic Church in Ireland were discussing zero hour contracts, in which people are obliged to be available for work even if they are not called in work today? Unfortunately, once again, the answer would seem to be no.
Rather than discussing some of the important themes I have mentioned above, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin decided to inform the public that he had decided not to send his three seminarians to Maynooth because he was disturbed by rumours about a poisonous atmosphere in Maynooth. One wonders did Dr. Martin realise that August is the silly season for the media, and that his announcement would lead to a deluge of coverage in the Irish media about the suitability of Maynooth as a training centre for seminarians. The the tsunami of invective and gleeful nods-and-winks that have resulted from his announcement was an embarrassment for the Irish Catholic Church.
The President of Maynooth, Monsignor Hugh Connelly, was vigorously pursued by Keelin Shanley in an interview on August 5th 2016. He made it perfectly clear that allegations are not facts and that he and the College formation staff have difficult decisions to make when assessing whether (or not) someone has a vocation to the priesthood. Allegations need to be investigated and, in our legal system, those against whom allegations are made are innocent until proven guilty. Making these assessments as to whether a person is suitable or unsuitable for ministry in the priesthood is a difficult task. People who have very rigid moral or theological views, or who are committed to a pre-Vatican II vision of Church are often not suitable for parish ministry in the contemporary Church. This does not mean that they cannot have very productive, creative and fulfilling lives within the Catholic Church.
Fr Brendan Hoban of the Association of Catholic Priests warned that Archbishop Diarmuid Martin’s decision will have far-reaching consequences, not just for Maynooth but for the Irish Catholic Church. He also stated that Archbishop Martin’s arguments about moving students to Rome “are not convincing”. Fr. Hoban went on to make it clear that that many of participants in the media scrum triggered by Archbishop Martin’s comments have a particular vision of the kind of church that they want to see promoted in Ireland today.
In criticising the Association of Catholic Priests, Michael Kelly, the editor of The Irish Catholic, referred to the Association of Catholic Priests (ACP) as ‘left wing.’ This is not meant as a compliment; but labelling people is hardly a way to conduct a serious discussion. I am proud of the fact that during the 1970s and 1980s I was involved with the justice and peace ministry of the Mindanao-Sulu pastoral council in the Philippines. I witnessed the extraordinary courage of lay people who took decisions, often at huge risk to their own lives, to protect the well-being of people on the margins of society. During the past 35 years I have been involved in developing the Care of Creation ministry in the Catholic Church. For me these initiatives are consistent with the Sermon on the Mount and chapter 25 of Mathew’s Gospel,
On the issue of ministry, the ACP has been pointing out for the past five years that priestly ministry is collapsing in Ireland. There are 1.2 million Catholics in the Archdiocese of Dublin, yet Archbishop Martin is talking about transferring a mere three seminarians to Rome. We need a completely new structure of ministry in the Catholic Church in Ireland if we wish to have the Eucharist available to us in the future and have competent pastoral care for everyone.
Finally, I was amazed that during all the of the controversy which ensued during the week, nobody mentioned three of the most significant documents of the modern Church – The Joy of the Gospel, Laudato Si’ : On Care For Our Common Home and The Joy of Love. These are pivotal documents in the modern Church and yet, they were missing for the debate.
I look forward to the day when the media – if they are genuinely interested in the future of the Irish Church- will afford the same time, interest and energy to discussing the latter as they have to this week’s Maynooth story.
Was Archbishop Martin Wise to Raise this Media Scrum?