|

Tenets of Catholicism are ideals not rules, says Irish bishop

The Catholic Church will not reject people because they use contraception, don’t attend Mass every Sunday, have sex outside marriage or live lives that run counter to the ideals of the Church, according to the Bishop of Cork and Ross.
Bishop John Buckley has said the central tenets of Catholicism were not established as rules of memberships but as “ideals”.
“These are all ideals that we must try to live up to. If you do not meet all these ideals, it does not mean that you cannot take your place at the table the Lord has prepared for you. The Church is a refuge for the weak, not a home for the perfect.
“I welcome all to the Church and I would encourage everyone to welcome all. I will hear no condemnation or rejection of people. Jesus loves his people no less in their absence,” he said.
In an end-of-year interview, he said he welcomed with open arms those who only turn up to Mass once a year, namely Christmas Day. “Irish people have a religious instinct. I believe that firmly. People retain that instinct even though they are not regular Massgoers. They may not attend regularly, but they still retain their affiliations. You will see them at funerals, at communions, even though they may have grown casual or careless,” he says.
Bishop Buckley said that people needed to realise, especially in a time of recession, that religion is about hope and strength and not about condemnation. “For all the talk of Mass attendance falling, if the church was a political party, it would form a one-party government with an overwhelming majority in this country.
“Jesus Christ is a message of hope, a message of joy, we must share it. As Pope Benedict said ‘many people now think the Church is a collection of prohibitions, but it is not. It’s positive, it’s totally different,” he said.
During the Apostolic Visitation, the visiting senior clerics discussed the possible amalgamation and even halving of the number of dioceses in this country.
At present there are 26 dioceses, all led by a bishop or archbishop. Bishop Buckley does not agree with the concept of amalgamation. “I would rather see a redrawing of the boundaries rather than an amalgamation ie, the County Cork town of Macroom is in Cloyne, Blarney in also in Cloyne. There is an argument for having these in Cork and Ross. Amalgamation is a blunt instrument” he said.
As for the Pope’s assertion in a recent book that there were no animals in the manger in Bethlehem, the bishop doesn’t believe schools should be discarding animal costumes just yet. “I’ve wondered about it and I’ve wondered was it tongue in cheek? The animals are part of the crib as we know it. I think we’ll continue on with the crib as we know it” he said.
• Clare O’Sullivan’s interview with Bishop Buckley was first published in the Irish Examiner on 4 January 2013
 
 

Similar Posts

  • Pope Francis gives local bishops more responsibility for Mass translations

    Articles
    11 Comments

    Pope Francis gives local bishops more responsibility for Mass translations.
    “In order that the renewal of the whole liturgical life might continue, it seemed opportune that some principles handed on since the time of the [Second Vatican] Council should be more clearly reaffirmed and put into practice.”

  • The War against Francis

    Articles
    12 Comments

    Brendan Hoban, in his Western People column, writes about tensions that exist in church.
    “While the big battle – and battle it is – is going on in Rome, there are more minor skirmishes taking place at national, diocesan and parish level, between those convinced of the need to introduce sweeping changes in the Church’s laws and practices and those holding on grimly to the past.”
    “It is difficult to see how there can be any agreement between sides that are mutually and diametrically opposed to one another – sometimes to the point of bitterness – and every reforming effort by Francis is being fought tooth and nail, even reforms that are necessary for the very survival of the faith in parishes all over the world.”

  • Vatican II; the ‘sure compass’ of Pope Francis

    Articles, Pope Francis
    1 Comment

    Richard R. Gaillardetz writing in the National Catholic Reporter maintains that Pope Francis’ correcting Cardinal Sarah’s misrepresentation of ‘Magnum Principium’ is but “another concrete confirmation of the pope’s single-minded intention to realize the council’s reformist agenda. He may be the first post-conciliar pope not to have played a role at Vatican II, but no pope has more comprehensively summoned forth the council’s comprehensive call for reform and renewal.”

  • A Clear Voice?

    Articles, Liturgy
    2 Comments

    Fr. Anthony Ruff OSB reports on the meeting of the U.S. bishops at Baltimore.
    He raises the possibility of some movement on the ongoing problems with the current “translation” of the Roman Missal with the election of a new chair to the U.S. bishops liturgy committee.
    “it is noteworthy that the bishop who spoke most negatively about the new translation, Archbishop Wilton Gregory, was a candidate to be chair of the USCCB liturgy committee. He was elected. His term will begin in 2016.”
    ” Archbishop Wilton Gregory, also a former USCCB liturgy committee chair, rose to echo Trautman’s concerns. Before printing up more books with the current translation, we ought to look at the problems with the translation. There should be a review of the problems with the new Missal.”

    Isn’t it time the Irish bishops addressed the problem realistically and had a real discussion about it?

6 Comments

  1. Paul Burns says:

    Seems a perfectly sensible and welcoming approach though I wonder how widely accepted his views are among his clerical colleagues. My daughter had to marry in a Unitarian Church because her fiancé was divorced and so could not marry in a Catholic church. Very disappointing for all concerned.
    Glad he debunked the ‘no animals in the manger’ statement. Otherwise we’ll have renewed debate on whether there was a virgin there too 😉

    Reply
  2. Joe O'Leary says:

    What makes this sound new is that so much polemic from rightwing Catholics and from their critics who take them seriously is predicated on the idea that the Church is into the business of weeding out the unworthy.

    Reply
  3. Martin Murray says:

    Catholicism at last living up to its name.

    Reply

  4. If any “tenets” are laid out in the Book of Canon Law…….they are rules………does that help?

    Reply

  5. I thank God every single day for Archbishop Charles Brown coming to Ireland. I listen intentively to every speech he gives wherever he goes, he lifts my heart and he is full of joy and love for the Church. Thank you Archbishop Brown and thank you Pope Benedict XVI for teaching us what is good and true, the Teachings of Christ. God bless you all.

    Reply
  6. Angela Hanrahan says:

    How refreshing to read of a member of the hierarchy prepared to put his head above the parapet and try to lift the heavy burdens, hard to bear, laid on peoples’ shoulders. A message of hope for this New Year.

    Reply

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.