Things Fall Apart

Chris McDonnell
One of W B Yeats’ most celebrated poems, ‘The Second Coming’, has these lines in the opening stanza:
    ‘…Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.’

It was written in 1919, in the aftermath of the Great War, when the privation and suffering of that conflict were still vividly fresh in the life experience of countless millions of people across the torn continent of Europe.
There is something of unremitting despair in that first line, the dissolving of certainty, the break-up of once cherished options where the furniture of lives, once secure, has been shattered by circumstance.
The New Order that was to emerge coloured the pattern of relationships for the rest of that violent century and continues to do so in our time. Only now, some of the safeguards and sureties that framed the later 20th century years have become questionable.
Politically this is self-evident, with the U.K. set to leave the EU for we know not what, turmoil and protectionism rampant in a new US administration and numerous conflicts world-wide fed with the potent fuel of terrorism and bigotry.
Our Church has not escaped the secular storms that we have all experienced, a fact that should not surprise us for though we carry the name of ‘Christian’, we too are part of the huge social movement that has been the soundtrack of our life time.
It has been a time of challenging questioning, when asking ‘why?’ or even ‘why not?’ has become acceptable. For some, that has been a matter of concern, unfamiliar with asking questions, but well-experienced in receiving answers. I have often said to my grandchildren, ‘ask me any question you want but don’t always expect a neat and tidy answer’. It would be foolish to ignore the stress that has been felt in consequence of this changed culture.
But for others, it has been a liberation, an opportunity to share, a chance to understand through a deeper appreciation, an experience of open hands that share, rather than the semi-closed fist and pointed finger of instruction that tells you how to think.
We have seen a movement within the Church that, in some ways, reflects the line of Yeats. ‘Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold’, but not completely. For our centre, Christ incarnate, is secure and will always remain. What will change with each generation, and I would suggest, must change, is the manner in which we respond to this eternal experience of the loving God.
When the signs of strain are such that cracks appear in a structure, there are three immediate choices. Ignore the evidence and trust that all will be sorted, make-do with some sticky tape until a later, more convenient date, or attend to the issue before there are more serious consequences.
It is heartening to see the manner in which Francis has approached difficult and serious issues. Above all, he has listened, not just to those appointed to high office but also to the poor and ordinary folk in our pilgrim Church. He has met with the outsider, the one who doesn’t quite fit the mould, the expected pattern. He has made it clear that he feels more comfortable with his Christian mission being expressed in this way than with an ostentatious way of life that we had come to accept in a hierarchical Church. It is that ‘centre’ that has begun to crumble and which ‘cannot hold’.
When the centre of something has been so strong, it is not surprising ‘that things fall apart’ when there is change. Each of us in our ‘safety zone’ feel secure until the challenge comes and we are called to make our own informed decisions. That’s the time when ‘our centre’ is truly tested, when we are asked that personal question of our allegiance to the Risen Lord and not to the ephemeral lifestyle that it has often been our lot to experience. That is the time of facing a reality which we cannot ignore.
The example we have been offered, of a Bishop of Rome who listens to his people, who helps with the reality of their daily lives, who seeks a relationship of understanding and not one of misplaced condemnation, is one that should be replicated across the Church, for he is truly prophetic person.
If only it were so, if only there was such an acceptance of his wisdom.
The Yeats quote will soon be 100 years old. The events of the intervening years reflect our inability to learn from experience. Don’t let’s give up just yet.

Similar Posts

  • The Plank in my Eye

    Brian Fahy, inspired by the Gospel of the day, reflects on his earlier life and choices that were made. A very apt reflection in the context of our ongoing debate about the wellbeing of priests.
    “We are blind to so many things in life, both individuals and organisations. I can see the failings in others easily. I stand outside them and my view is unhindered. But it is not easy to see my own failings or funny ways. We need some distance in order to get some perspective on ourselves. I can look back at my thirty year- old self and see exactly what was going on. At the time I could not see any of this.”

  • Sin, Mortal & Otherwise

    Donald Cozens writing in Commonweal suggests that ‘Pope Francis, in harmony with the work of contemporary theologians like Bernard Häring, Charles Curran, Margaret Farley and others, is showing us how to move beyond the narrow legalisms of act-centered morality.’
    This is in contrast to the position that has pertained since the time of the Council of Trent when there was ‘an emphasis on the “act committed” rather than on the penitent’s encounter with the healing mercy of Jesus Christ and his or her overall moral orientation.’

  • Laudato Si and the Path to COP 22

    Seán McDonagh, SSC reports on a Joint Consultation on ‘Laudato Si’ and the Path to ‘COP 22’ organised by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences.
    He quotes Prof. Ramanathan Veerabhadran as saying “the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming is the most important environmental issue facing the world today.”
    “At the end of the meeting the group released this document in preparation for the COP 22 which will take place in Marraakesh from November 7 to 18th 2016.
    “ The Paris Climate Agreement is historic. For the first time since the signing of the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), all countries have agreed to act in order to protect the planet. The core goals include: (1) keeping warming to “well below 2-degrees C” and “to pursue efforts to keep below 1.5-degree C”; (2) enabling countries to adapt to the adverse impacts already underway; and (3) ensuring the flow of fair and equitable financing to achieve the climate goals.”

3 Comments

  1. Chris, I share your admiration for and hope in Pope Francis, however, I suspect that he is too steeped in Tradition, too steeped in Old Theology, and too steeped in Clericalism, to create any major shift in the Church. Maybe, just maybe if he approves of a deaconate for women, then, maybe, maybe, he will initiate that major shift….On the other hand, things do fall a part…and so…what could come…may or may not have anything to do with Pope Francis!

  2. Kevin Walters says:

    “When the signs of strain are such that cracks appear in a structure, there are three immediate choices. Ignore the evidence and trust that all will be sorted, make-do with some sticky tape until a later, more convenient date, or attend to the issue before there are more serious consequences”———————–
    Will this be a future issue for the Church? See link
    Many on the site have alluded to priests having sexual relationships (cohabiting) if this is true can there be any hope for the established Church.
    https://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=50509#.WKrH6md74fP
    Leading to further demoralization wake up make haste venerate the true Divine Mercy Image an image broken man and lead from the true base of the pyramid a place of humility.
    kevin your brother
    In Christ

  3. Lloyd Allan MacPherson says:

    We listened and spoke and summoned the courage to be true Christians but the message fell on deaf ears it seems or upon a divided Church wrecked by “secular storms”. I’ve grown to detest the word “secular” – it speaks of a universality Catholics have grown to fear.
    I’d like to hear what you all feel are the most “Christian” organisations right now in your midst? The question is : “Are they in your midst?” From my perspective, I think of The Venus Project, The Zeitgeist Movement, Simbi, Freeworlders, Open Source Initiative, Ubuntu – have you ever heard of them? Probably not. What has been the historical partner of Christianity since, it seems, time eternal – money. What do these organisations rally for – a resource-based, money-free society.
    The Bible is the most anti-currency book you will ever find. It hates money and sees it as incompatible with a life dedicated to the common good Jesus proclaims. Has anyone ever questioned this? Do you see how it advocates for a “money free society”? This is the reason things are falling apart for most – remember, they are historically the best times ever for a certain percentage of the population.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.