I am not sure if this is the appropriate thread for what I have to say, but none of the others seems any more suitable, and (before I take my leave of this site) I do feel an explanation from me is wa
I would not expect, nor think it necessary, that a forensic check be done on all comments which are included on your website, but I agree it is often very obvious from the content and tone of comments
The qustion of anonymity raised by this posting is very important. If someone has an opinion, either for or against a particular posting, then they should have the honesty to say who they are and wher
My concern is that the comment I tried to post was removed without explanation or answer. My name was on it - Malachi O'Doherty. if you wish to have an exclusive conversation within a defined circle,
Martin still thinks missing Mass on Sunday is mortally sinful. But please note that the Sunday obligation is a matter of canon law and canon law is very malleable to custom as its interpreter. Many ve
No, Iona didn't work with the ACP on the Fr Reynolds case. What I referred to was the fact that the ACP made excellent use of the poll carried out on our behalf by Amarach showing that many members of
In reply to Mary O Vallely: I too have wondered about posting too often, but for the most part I am just replying to comments others have made about my comments!
When I referred to "enemies of the Chu
I am surprised that the anonymous comments are tending to come from those who are critical of the Association. I would have expected it to be the other way round.
.
I think it is very reasonable to on
Keeping secrets has not served us, as a Church, well. While appreciating that some names may be false I would much prefer that anonymous comments, or 'part-name' comments would not be posted.
Delighted to read Fr Brian D'Arcy's comments on your site.
For years he has been the lone voice of reason, understanding and common sense for ordinary Catholics and no doubt he has been encouraged oft
Comments
All recent Comments
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012I am not sure if this is the appropriate thread for what I have to say, but none of the others seems any more suitable, and (before I take my leave of this site) I do feel an explanation from me is wa
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012I would not expect, nor think it necessary, that a forensic check be done on all comments which are included on your website, but I agree it is often very obvious from the content and tone of comments
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012The qustion of anonymity raised by this posting is very important. If someone has an opinion, either for or against a particular posting, then they should have the honesty to say who they are and wher
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012My concern is that the comment I tried to post was removed without explanation or answer. My name was on it - Malachi O'Doherty. if you wish to have an exclusive conversation within a defined circle,
Brian D’Arcy reflects on the recent ACP survey
April 22 2012Martin still thinks missing Mass on Sunday is mortally sinful. But please note that the Sunday obligation is a matter of canon law and canon law is very malleable to custom as its interpreter. Many ve
Brendan Hoban on responses to the ACP survey
April 19 2012No, Iona didn't work with the ACP on the Fr Reynolds case. What I referred to was the fact that the ACP made excellent use of the poll carried out on our behalf by Amarach showing that many members of
Brendan Hoban on responses to the ACP survey
April 19 2012In reply to Mary O Vallely: I too have wondered about posting too often, but for the most part I am just replying to comments others have made about my comments! When I referred to "enemies of the Chu
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012I am surprised that the anonymous comments are tending to come from those who are critical of the Association. I would have expected it to be the other way round. . I think it is very reasonable to on
Anonymous comments should not be posted here
April 22 2012Keeping secrets has not served us, as a Church, well. While appreciating that some names may be false I would much prefer that anonymous comments, or 'part-name' comments would not be posted.
Brian D’Arcy reflects on the recent ACP survey
April 22 2012Delighted to read Fr Brian D'Arcy's comments on your site. For years he has been the lone voice of reason, understanding and common sense for ordinary Catholics and no doubt he has been encouraged oft
Popular Posts
Categories