I agree that it does not have to be either one or the other. When the ACP was founded it set out its objectives very clearly. No one was forced to join. It has a right to try to achieve its objecti
Because one supports the mission of the Church, the other attacks it. One seeks to support the work of priests in saving souls, the other attacks the unity, the faith, and the morals of the Church.
I'm saying this: the ACP need to decide WHAT they are: a society for the support of priests in the apostolate, or a lobby group for radical changes in the Catholic Church. I see a future and a use for
My feeling is that the whole dynamic around the new translation is like every issue in the 'culture wars' in the US where we are either for or against and then some spend energy defending their positi
Spencer, your view of what it is to be a Catholic needs some further thought. To accept the Catechism without reservation or complaint would not fit the bill. It is a minimalist approach and a failure
''all in attendance recognised their own need of this mutually caring body that had at its heart, the care of clergy and their needs. ''
What I read on this post is laudable. There seems to be a dispa
The then leader of Zambia, Kaunda, had in the period just before the date of that debt, nationalised almost everything of worth in the country and beggared it as a result of corruption of state bodies
@ MM I assure you that I do think too and have decided, after much thought, to be a Catholic and so accept the Catechism without reservation or complaint.
Comments
All recent Comments
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011I agree that it does not have to be either one or the other. When the ACP was founded it set out its objectives very clearly. No one was forced to join. It has a right to try to achieve its objecti
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011Because one supports the mission of the Church, the other attacks it. One seeks to support the work of priests in saving souls, the other attacks the unity, the faith, and the morals of the Church.
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011Why does it have to be either/or? One is dealing with the damage already inflicited by the system and the other is preventing future damage.
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011I'm saying this: the ACP need to decide WHAT they are: a society for the support of priests in the apostolate, or a lobby group for radical changes in the Catholic Church. I see a future and a use for
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011Martin would you please spell out in simple language what exactly you are saying.
The Trouble with the New Roman Missal Rita Ferrone
August 4 2011My feeling is that the whole dynamic around the new translation is like every issue in the 'culture wars' in the US where we are either for or against and then some spend energy defending their positi
Assembly of the Irish Church
November 4 2011Spencer, your view of what it is to be a Catholic needs some further thought. To accept the Catechism without reservation or complaint would not fit the bill. It is a minimalist approach and a failure
Report of Clogher ACP Meeting
November 11 2011''all in attendance recognised their own need of this mutually caring body that had at its heart, the care of clergy and their needs. '' What I read on this post is laudable. There seems to be a dispa
Gospel Reading, Sunday 13 November: A second look at the talents
November 11 2011The then leader of Zambia, Kaunda, had in the period just before the date of that debt, nationalised almost everything of worth in the country and beggared it as a result of corruption of state bodies
Assembly of the Irish Church
November 4 2011@ MM I assure you that I do think too and have decided, after much thought, to be a Catholic and so accept the Catechism without reservation or complaint.
Popular Posts
Categories