Reflections at a Funeral

As we laid Seán Fagan to rest after all the suffering and injustice inflicted on him by the leaders of his own church, it became all too evident how divided the Catholic Church has become in Ireland and how so little is being done to heal the wounds of our internal divisions, and this at a time when the church is in grievous difficulties – many of its own making.
Socio-politically it has fallen from a great height, when it was a power in the land and its authority was unquestioned. However, the Holy Spirit is more likely to be listened to in the Irish Catholic Church now that it has been deprived of its privileged national status and has become a humiliated and insecure organization badly in need of public acceptance.
The presence of a bishop at Seán’s funeral would have been a golden occasion to express metanoia and the readiness to respond more sensitively to the the message of the Gospel. It would have meant so much to his family. It would have given witness to the triumph of Gospel values over institutional church attitudes. Regrettably no bishop was present. I believe that this omission was not personal; it was institutional. There were almost certainly several bishops who would have been glad to be there, but something prevented it. One wonders what and why?
It is highly probable that many bishops knew that the Roman Curia had behaved in a thoroughly unjust and unchristian fashion when it attacked six Irish priests who were giving admirable and enlightened service to God’s People. No bishop expressed public disapproval of what was happening, or came to the defence of priests who were being treated so appallingly by men who would have described themselves, somewhat implausibly, as Christians.
The Second Vatican Council made it very clear that diocesan bishops take precedence over curial bureaucrats, even those of prelatical rank. It would mean so much to many Catholics – to say nothing about the victims of curial injustice – if our bishops and religious superiors were to come to the defence of fellow Catholics being treated with no regard for justice or human rights. It would go far to heal the breach between the bishops and those Catholics who are looking for change in their church and receiving no understanding or encouragement from their pastors.
It cannot be said too often that peace, unity and friendship in the church do not depend on agreement about matters that do not belong to the essence of the faith. What the Gospel prescribes is willingness to live together in peace, friendship and respect for ideas and attitudes that one cannot share, and finally, if possible, even to be open to the desirability of reform.
Could our bishops not respect the value of diversity in the church and whole-heartedly reciprocate the offer of groups like the ACP to work in friendship, rather than to meet in polite formality. Pope Francis is leading with words of mercy and healing. Why are we not following?
Gabriel Daly OSA

Similar Posts

  • Yes Pope, a.k.a. Yes Minister

    The Website IP5, or onepeterfive, carries an interesting article about an open letter written to Pope Francis by a “former member of the curia”.
    The letter originally appeared in the German-language magazine, FOCUS.
    While clearly meant to be read as a criticism of Pope Francis it perhaps unintentionally gives a disturbing insight into much of the culture and mindset of the curia and how they see their position, power and status in the church.
    Do all bureaucracies, in the spirit of “Yes Minister’s” Sir Humphrey, eventually come to think that they are there to be served rather than serve, that all wisdom resides in them and none in the temporary ministers, or popes, who come and go and that all decisions should be left firmly in their control?
    Pope Benedict’s reasons for retiring become clearer every day.

    [for international readers; “Yes Minister” was a BBC tv comedy. The chief civil servant, bureaucrat, Sir Humphrey was apt to reply ‘Yes Minister’ to every request of the Government Minister and then worked wholeheartedly at subverting every single plan and policy of the minister if it in any way infringed on the power and control of the civil service.}

  • Ecology, Economics, and Ethics

    In response to Seán McDonagh’s call for more discussion in church about issues that matter and are relevant to the lives of all people rather than silly season tabloid fodder Joe O Leary replied with a long response that includes an article by Stefano Zamagni, on “Ecology, Economics, and Ethics”.
    We carry it as a stand alone post rather than a reply as it is well worth reading. Our thanks to Joe.

  • Spiritfest – A positive experience of church

    Mary Smiddy, a member of Killeagh-Inch Pastoral Council, was recently involved in a “Spiritfest” which ran the last weekend of September.
    Here she gives a report on a very successful event.
    “At a time when the church gets much negative publicity I feel that much that is good in our churches and parishes is not acknowledged or recognised. Because of that I would like to share some of our experiences and learning over the Spiritfest weekend.
    The event illustrates the vibrancy, excitement and joy that can be found in parishes throughout the country and what is possible with a little planning, preparation and willingness to try something different while remaining true to our faith and traditions.”

8 Comments

  1. Joe O'Leary says:

    No bishop at the funeral…. that is one of the most disheartening things I have read about the Irish Church

  2. Brendan Cafferty says:

    I was following reports of the funeral and wondered if any Bishop attended. Now I know. Could not even one be found, or another one or two so as not isolate the one ? What about mould breaker A’Bishop Diarmuid Martin,after all the funeral took place in his diocese so perhaps he should have attended with some of his auxiliary bishops. Who could blame a bishop for attending the funeral of anyone,least of all a priest. Hiding in the upper room ?

  3. I have written about the unfortunate messages sent by liturgies. The presence of a bishop, particularly in mufti, and as a member of the worshiping community rather than seated on high resplendent in purple, says so much about the church as the people of God. Another missed opportunity. http://www.scouserquinn.com/?p=4714

  4. Nessan Vaughan says:

    Gabriel Daly continues to challenge and inspire. I agree with everything he has said in this piece.
    On a (slightly) different note, I recall his informed response to conservatives who dismissed those who challenged the current church model and aspects of the church’s teaching by calling them (us) ‘à la carte Catholics’, : Gabriel pointed out that we were part of the interpretive community of followers of Jesus Christ.
    Many thanks, Gabriel.

  5. Gina menzies says:

    Thank you again for your insight, compassion and integrity, we need so much more courage like yours.
    It is a loss to the Irish church that you were never made bishop!

  6. A marvellous piece by Gabriel Daly, the sentiments of which all sensible people will concur with. Many thanks.

  7. Robert Grady Harp says:

    Hardly christian, much less Catholic. Shame on them. Though there is no lack of clerical pomposity and careerism in my own church, I do not regret leaving the Roman Catholic Church. May Father Fagan rest in peace and rise in glory.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.