Padraig McCarthy @ 12Thank you for your comment Padraig
To your point at 2 I did not write “There is fairly substantial evidence, even …etc” it was a quote, as it is clearly shown, t
Yes, EVIDENCE, not necessarily PROOF. An apology more in the mode we have come to expect from Francis.Does the similarity between the case of Luis Fernando Figari's Sodalitium Christianae Vitae and
See also: a longer report:
https://cruxnow.com/pope-in-chile-and-peru/2018/01/22/pope-regrets-word-choice-abuse-chile-stands-contested-bishop/
Also:
https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/franc
Paddy@9: "Great man though Francis is, it seems even he, like other good men who contribute to this site, once this issue arises, simply cannot prise the clericalist log from the retina."
Ouch! but t
Consider that IF Bishop Barros is completely guiltless, as he loudly claims, then the entire media and countless Catholic voices are indeed involved in a massive slander campaign, now directed against
"Under normal circumstances (Before credibility had been lost) this would have been more acceptable, but as Sean O’Conaill @4 says “If this man is not supported by his people, how can he function
Kevin #10:
Three distinct matters.1. Can Bishop Barros effectively carry out his ministry if he does not have the trust of his people? It seems clear that the answer is that he cannot.2. You write
Pádraig McCarthy @ 4 “Come Holy Spirit”Is the guilt or innocence of Bishop Barros the crucial question?
None of us can truly know the guilt or innocence of this bishop but what we do k
Comments
All recent Comments
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Padraig McCarthy @ 12Thank you for your comment Padraig To your point at 2 I did not write “There is fairly substantial evidence, even …etc” it was a quote, as it is clearly shown, t
Pope apologises to victims of abuse for words used in defence of Bishop Barros
January 22 2018Yes, EVIDENCE, not necessarily PROOF. An apology more in the mode we have come to expect from Francis.Does the similarity between the case of Luis Fernando Figari's Sodalitium Christianae Vitae and
Pope apologises to victims of abuse for words used in defence of Bishop Barros
January 22 2018See also: a longer report: https://cruxnow.com/pope-in-chile-and-peru/2018/01/22/pope-regrets-word-choice-abuse-chile-stands-contested-bishop/ Also: https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/franc
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Paddy@9: "Great man though Francis is, it seems even he, like other good men who contribute to this site, once this issue arises, simply cannot prise the clericalist log from the retina." Ouch! but t
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Consider that IF Bishop Barros is completely guiltless, as he loudly claims, then the entire media and countless Catholic voices are indeed involved in a massive slander campaign, now directed against
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018"Under normal circumstances (Before credibility had been lost) this would have been more acceptable, but as Sean O’Conaill @4 says “If this man is not supported by his people, how can he function
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Kevin #10: Three distinct matters.1. Can Bishop Barros effectively carry out his ministry if he does not have the trust of his people? It seems clear that the answer is that he cannot.2. You write
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Kevin@10, very well said.
Return of the Servant Myth
January 19 2018@1 PC - much better, thank you.
Bishop Barros controversy in Chile
January 20 2018Pádraig McCarthy @ 4 “Come Holy Spirit”Is the guilt or innocence of Bishop Barros the crucial question? None of us can truly know the guilt or innocence of this bishop but what we do k
Popular Posts
Categories