The laity has spoken and the Church must learn
The laity has spoken and the Church must learn
24 September 2015
The Catholic bishops of England and Wales have published an extraordinarily candid piece of criticism, accusing the Church of being bigoted, misogynistic, controlling, judgemental, outdated and Pharisaical. These are all words taken from a summary of responses to a consultation conducted by the Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales in preparation for the forthcoming international synod of bishops in Rome next month, on the subject of marriage and family life.
Yet there is no cynicism among these accusations. Rather, the laity who commented are revealed as warm, generous, open-hearted and still committed to their faith. What they were criticising was the “official” Church, however defined – the disapproving judgemental hierarchical Church as portrayed in the media and as described by its enemies and those it has hurt. And as many of them point out, this is not based on the Church as it presently is under Pope Francis, but on how it is perceived to have acted over generations.
The consultation produced a rich seam of spiritual insight and reflection. It pleads for things to change, especially regarding those who are estranged from the Church over issues of sexual ethics. A constant refrain was that the next generation of Catholics will be permanently alienated unless there is change that makes the Church a warmer home for women, for gay people, and for the divorced and remarried.
They want a Church that engages with married life and its messy difficulties realistically and humanely, not one offering idealistic textbook answers.
As Cardinal Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster, said at a press conference where the summary was unveiled, the depth of faith the respondents disclosed was humbling and moving. It even moved him to say that “this family witness to the Church is very very important, more than what the Church can teach the family”.
By “the Church” he meant, indicating the clerical platform party at the press conference, “in the sense of us lot”. Indeed, one respondent is quoted as saying: “It would seem that right now the Church may well have more to learn from marriage and family life than to teach.” It is the sensus fidelium at work.
Hence a recurrent theme was the divide between the clerical hierarchy and the laity. Putting an official stamp of recognition on that, as Cardinal Nichols did, could well be a watershed moment in the life of the Church. It establishes that the real experts on family life are those actually living it, not celibate theologians, canon lawyers and bishops.
This could have enormous consequences in issues ranging from contraception and homosexuality to married priests and even female priests. While an overwhelming number wanted the lifting of the ban on divorced and remarried Catholics receiving Holy Communion, they equally wanted the Church to promote marriage as a lifelong vocation.
If the bishops needed evidence that the laity put a high value on marriage, they have it. They also have evidence, however, that their stewardship of this priceless institution has been found seriously wanting. That is the challenge

Similar Posts


  1. Noel Casey says:

    What became of the attempt at consultation this side of the Irish Sea? Was any attempt at all made? I for one – and I keep fairly well in contact with the ecclesiastical heartbeat – have heard scarcely a whisper; or should that be a murmur ?

  2. “It establishes that the real experts on family life are those actually living it, not celibate theologians, canon lawyers and bishops.”
    Now, why did we all not cop on to that blatantly obvious truth earlier ! Perhaps some did. Perhaps many did. I always took Vincent Nichols to be a thoroughly good and sound man. Towards the end of the Dark Ages, pre-Francis, it was obvious that he was taking on a conservative veneer which, I suppose, many in his position felt they had to. Now, I think, Vincent is finding his true self again.
    I was really excited when I read this piece, firstly, in the Tablet on Saturday, Catholic bishops showing sound common sense and humility in dealing with these sensitive and controversial issues. So, it was I who suggested that this piece appear on our ACP site , expecting a deluge of comment from all those just as excited, as I was, with the great sense of enlightenment shown by the Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales. Yet, so far, there has not been a word of comment or reaction to the piece. It’s a funny old world!!

    1. In fairness Seamus Ahearne’s piece “Protecting the Pope” was penned in response to it.

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.