The priests of Mexico, bleeding with their flock

http://www.christiantoday.com/reporter/harry-farley
Why Are So Many Mexican Priests Being Killed?
by Harry Farley
 
One of the world’s most Catholic countries is also the most dangerous to be a Catholic priest.
Mexico’s population is 81 per cent Catholic, according to the CIA Factbook and Pew Research Centre. Only Brazil boasts a higher number of Catholics.
But this weekend a third priest in a week was found dead. Jose Alfredo Lopez Guillen’s body was discovered near the town of Puruandiro in Michoacan state. He is the 15th priest to have been killed since 2012 when President Enrique Peña Nieto’s six-year term began, a 100 per cent increase compared to the former President Felipe Calderón.
But the figures point to an even more concerning trend of gradually increasing violence against clergy.
Since 1990, 52 priests have been killed, according to a report by Mexico’s Catholic Multimedia Centre (Centro Católico Multimedial – CCM) which monitors violence against clergy. But of those murders, 40 have occurred in the last decade alone.
Murdered Catholic priests in Mexico may be symbolic of wider violence across the country as the war on drugs continues. A spike in priest killings in 2006 coincided with a wholesale increase in casualties as the Mexican military began its attempt to crush drug-related violence. “Priests are not the only martyrs in Mexico,” said one missionary working in Mexico.
Jorge Eugenio Hernandez Trasloheros, a professor in Latin American studies at the University of Mexico, told Christian Today it was “not strange that priests suffer the same fate of the people”. He said sometimes priests were targeted because of money within the parish alms system but more often priests were “very tight to the people” and the killings stoked fear.
“Mexican priests are leaders in their communities. They are no saints but they usually do their job very well. It is not strange that they are a target of the gangs. The criminals want people isolated and full of fear,” he said.
But Omar Sotelo, a priest and director of CCM, said clergy attract particular violence because they preach against injustice and violence. “They’re defending migrants, they’re against drug trafficking,” he said when his report was launched in February 2016. “And the priests often know who the criminals are, having seen them grow up in the towns. Eventually, some criminals can see that as a threat.”
He went on to say that older drug lords identified as Catholic but the younger generation of crime groups are “so dehumanised they target just about anything”.
But the idea Catholic clergy are merely victims of a holy war against drugs is not universally accepted. During Pope Francis’ visit to Central American in February, he gave what many saw as a roasting to the Catholic hierarchy.
Before Mexico’s top bishops he called on priests to fight against an “insidious threat” and told bishops they had lost their way amid “gossip” and “slander”. He urged them to “begin anew” as he said the religious authorities had engaged in “conceited schemes of careerism” and “empty plans for superiority”.
He said: “Be vigilant so that your vision will not be darkened by the gloomy mist of worldliness; do not allow yourselves to be corrupted by trivial materialism or by the seductive illusion of underhanded agreements; do not place your faith in the ‘chariots and horses’ of today’s pharaohs.”
Roberto Blancharte, a scholar at the Colegio de Mexico, said he had never seen such a “scolding so severe, so drastic, so brutal to any bishops’ group”, according to the New York Times.
Blancharte, an expert in the Mexican church, said there was a deep divide between the Church’s hierarchy who tend to live in luxury and mix with corrupt politicians, and its clergy, who rub shoulders with the country’s poorest.
David Shirk, director of the Justice in Mexico Project at the University of San Diego, agreed. “I don’t think anyone has dared to criticize the Catholic Church so vocally and so openly in recent times. And arguably it could have only come from the pope himself,” he said according to the LA Times.
“The church’s leaders have basically rested on their laurels, and in the worst cases have been as corrupt as the rest of Mexico’s political leaders.”
The disparity has not gone unnoticed by priests on the ground. “They never gave me support, not even words of inspiration: ‘We’re with you’,” Father Alejandro Solalinde in Oaxaca said of the Mexico City bishops, according to the paper. “I would have loved that.”
The bishops’ reluctance to support or engage with clergy fighting against drugs has raised suspicion that some may be in the pockets of drug traffickers or politicians wanting to dumb down reports of violence.
The belief church leaders have cowed to pressure is widespread among parishes and the silence over murdered priests only fuels this perception. “When a priest gets killed, it should be a rallying cry,” said Shirk. “We should know his name. He should be a martyr.”

Similar Posts

  • A life in the day of a Parish……

    Seamus Ahearne shares his thoughts on a day in the life of a parish
    “The life in the day could fill a book and not a page”
    “The routine of daily living is ‘killing the spirit’ of so many.”
    “We are invited to open the eyes of our hearts, minds, imaginations to the enjoyment, hilarity, fun, laughter and peace. It isn’t only Autumn is colourful. Life is full and good. The day goes on. “

  • A Clear Voice?

    Fr. Anthony Ruff OSB reports on the meeting of the U.S. bishops at Baltimore.
    He raises the possibility of some movement on the ongoing problems with the current “translation” of the Roman Missal with the election of a new chair to the U.S. bishops liturgy committee.
    “it is noteworthy that the bishop who spoke most negatively about the new translation, Archbishop Wilton Gregory, was a candidate to be chair of the USCCB liturgy committee. He was elected. His term will begin in 2016.”
    ” Archbishop Wilton Gregory, also a former USCCB liturgy committee chair, rose to echo Trautman’s concerns. Before printing up more books with the current translation, we ought to look at the problems with the translation. There should be a review of the problems with the new Missal.”

    Isn’t it time the Irish bishops addressed the problem realistically and had a real discussion about it?

  • Face Reality or opt for False Clarity

    Michael O’Loughlin writing in Americamagazine.org quotes Archbishop Mark Coleridge of Brisbane as saying “At times at the synod I heard voices that sounded very clear and certain but only because they never grappled with the real question or never dealt with the real facts”.
    “So there’s a false clarity that comes because you don’t address reality, and there’s a false certainty that can come for the same reason.”
    The pope, he said, is “bringing out into the very public setting of the papacy what any pastor does in his parish or diocese.”
    Ultimately, individual believers have to discern where God is at work in their own lives—a process that doesn’t always lend itself to simple yes or no answers.

  • ‘Fundamentalists are people who don’t understand poetry.’

    Seamus Ahearne reflects on recent events and points to the need for real leadership in society and also a need for courageous leaders in church.
    Faced by events like Brussels and Lahore, with the seas becoming ‘insatiable cemeteries’ for those fleeing war he asks ‘Where will the needed leadership come from? Who will create the map that we need?
    In church Seamus tells us ‘Theology is full of poetic mystery but we were satisfied with crude prose for years and it passed as orthodoxy. It became official and those who stepped outside such thinking were condemned. The New Missal is a monument to fundamentalists who knew nothing of a living God or Grace. Their Liturgy was solemn, static and ignored the incarnation.’
    Seamus concludes, ‘Politicians. Church people. Educationalists. Trade-unionists. Society. All need to begin to learn humbly how to live out the Proclamation; the Gospel; the challenge of being a grown up nation and an adult Catholic. There is much to do.’

One Comment

  1. Lloyd Allan MacPherson says:

    It would be interesting to see any transcripts or eye witness accounts of these priests’ sermons. I think what they were preaching at the time of their murders is as important a fact as any.
    I guess if you were going to have anyone in your back pocket, a bishop would be the likely pick for a gang. Control the controllers. Mexico is one messed up place – Brazil, not much different. Cause? Income disparity mainly. It is estimated that 2,540 Mexicans share 43% of Mexico’s total individual wealth.
    Carlos Slim, the wealthiest man in Mexico seems to be a favourite of the Legionaries of Christ – his wealth is equal to 7% of the economy – 70 billion. I wonder if the Pope was referring to this in his remarks. The Legion’s investments : corporations affiliated with the arms race, pornography and high-end real estate to name a few.
    Who is responsible for oversight?

Join the Discussion

Keep the following in mind when writing a comment

  • Your comment must include your full name, and email. (email will not be published). You may be contacted by email, and it is possible you might be requested to supply your postal address to verify your identity.
  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger. Comments containing vulgarities, personalised insults, slanders or accusations shall be deleted.
  • Keep to the point. Deliberate digressions don't aid the discussion.
  • Including multiple links or coding in your comment will increase the chances of it being automati cally marked as spam.
  • Posts that are merely links to other sites or lengthy quotes may not be published.
  • Brevity. Like homilies keep you comments as short as possible; continued repetitions of a point over various threads will not be published.
  • The decision to publish or not publish a comment is made by the site editor. It will not be possible to reply individually to those whose comments are not published.